Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Money and Finances
Reply to "Term life insurance duration"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I actually think almost everyone here is wrong. A 20 year is what you need and want. The extra $50 is effectively gambling for a return. If you want to do that I have no objection, but recognize it for what it is. [/quote] This guy is correct. You are not insuring against a possible liability beyond 20 years. Your mids will be well established. you are just speculating on your own death.[/quote] No. Risk/reward says you take the longest term you could plausibly need. I’m the broker PP and I can’t tell you how many times people develop some major health condition before the end of their term and still need insurance beyond this term for a variety of reasons. As an example, I had a guy who was diagnosed with cancer one year before the end of his term. Therefore, he would be uninsurable for many years even after remission, if he were to in fact survive the cancer. He was well-off but still had loans in his business and wanted/needed life insurance to provide some liquidity in the event of his death. Since he was uninsurable, the only way to extend coverage was to do a conversion of his existing term policy into an indexed universal life policy (which is contractually guaranteed even if one’s health changes). His premium went from $4,000 per year on the term policy (he was a smoker) to about $20,000 per year on the universal life policy. It was great for me – I made a $22,000 commission on that sale – but it was a totally avoidable situation for him if he had just done a longer term. (He initially did a 10-year term at age 50, thinking he probably would not need coverage beyond age 60). And of course, as others have mentioned, even if you get a 30-year term, you can always drop it after 20 years if you no longer need it. Trust me, there’s no scenario in which the risk/reward calculation does not heavily favor buying the longest term you might plausibly need.[/quote]. Brokers are literally the last people I would trust on this since they have a vested interest in selling as much insurance as possible. I therefore don’t trust you. And as an economist I am very familiar with risk/reward calculations, and I assure you that you are wrong.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics