Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Berkeley and Stanford to ACC, does this hurt UVA and Duke?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Seems like they should just let football create some super-conferences...and the remaining sports just compete within a conference that makes geographic and historical sense.[/quote] This! They should allow football to join these quasi-NFL leagues and let the other sports continue to play in their regional conferences. Sort of like how ND is independent in football but oddly with the ACC for all other sports--- makes sense for ND to be in the B1G obviously. With adding Stanford and Cal next year, the ACC will be right after the Ivy League when it comes to the academic prowess of their schools. The B1G will be a distant third.[/quote] "Right after" the Ivy League is misleading. The ACC will run the gamut. The Ivy League does not run the gamut.[/quote] The B1G is coherent and made up of huge research dollar, large alumni base and flagship institutions. The Ivy is all private northeast elite universities The ACC is an incoherent, unrelated, geographically nonsensical, unvaluable media, grab bag of leftovers.[/quote] B1G is completely incoherent as a college athletics association. It is a coast-to-coast football minor league.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics