Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Repeat offender at 11 years old"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]“agreed to stay out of Northwest DC”? Is this the criminal justice version of NIMBY? He can be turned loose on society, as long as he doesn’t bother anyone in NW DC? Either he presents a danger to society or he doesn’t (and it appears he does).[/quote] As someone who lives in NE DC, I am not excited to apparently have to put up with violent crime just because I can’t afford to move to NW.[/quote] Eh. He was going to NW to do crime. Banning him from there makes sense. If he were going to SE to do crime, then he might have been banned from there instead. Thinking this is NIMBY? Y'all have some strange ideas.[/quote] +1. Stay away orders from the place you did your crime are almost universal when a criminal defendant is released. A whole quadrant is expansive, and I'd definitely object if I were his lawyer, but if they're issuing quadrant wide stay-aways, they're not just for Northwest. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
