Reply to Is marriage a bad deal for a rich man?

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Is marriage a bad deal for a rich man?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Most rich men want a woman who is available for them whenever they (the man) has time.  Even if there are no kids on the scene.  Someone who can come to his work retreats and evening functions, vacation the same time as them, be free whenever the man is done at work etc.  If you expect someone to deprioritize their own career you’re going to have to provide them with financial security [/quote]

Actually it’s both that are like this.

Regardless society has taught us women are capable and independent.  They don’t need no man etc…that is until they need alimony and CS.

It’s jut beneficial for men to marry, and if you’re a wealthy man and look decently attractive you’re in the top 1% and can have any women you pretty much choose.  Why settle for one and lose your livelihood?

Most men don’t have that option so they date who they can.  The idea of romantic relationships and traditional roles in a relationship are no longer the norm or desire for women.  So why should men stick to traditional roles (provider, breadwinner, protector, handyman) whey overall western society has told them they don’t want it?

Studies show by 2030 54% of women over 38 will be single and childless.  Thing is…most women want to have kids.  But the system is stacked against men in terms of the traditional marriage contract.  Guys realize it’s a losing bet for them and opt out.  65% if single men under the age of 35 aren’t even looking for relationships let alone in one.  So they’ve decided to just stay home instead of playing a game that intentionally has no path to victory [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics