Reply to Dating for 50+ men

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Dating for 50+ men"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][list][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]*and most of his assets are in a trust for his kids.[/quote]

The real reason old men aren’t worth it.[/quote]

Such an attractive mindset[/quote]

No one wants to spend the last 15 of their remaining good years taking care of someone who will not take care of them, either personally or financially. If you’re not going to be there in person AND you’re not going to leave money for that eventual purpose, you are simply [b]mining a younger woman for resources [/b]you will never repay. It’s different if you’re married and the remaining spouse has the remaining joint assets to provide for them.[/quote]

Kind of ironic, coming from a gold digger.[/quote]

It’s not golddigging to refuse to provide caretaking to someone who won’t return the act in any form.[/quote]

Who refused “any form”?[/quote]

DP— what form do you propose if time travel is out of the question? He’s not caring for her in her old age (men statistically don’t even care for their spouses when they fall seriously ill), so if he is not contributing resources to do so, what are you suggesting he brings to the table?[/quote]

How the hell do you get from “leaving stuff to his kids” to “not caring for her in her old age”?[/quote]

Because he will, in all probability, be dead. If he’s not making financial provision for her old age, what kind of provision is he making?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics