Reply to Level IV clustering

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "Level IV clustering"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]We have one kid getting the cluster model and another at the center. IME, the center is more rigorous. [/quote]

Can you expand on this?  Our school uses the clustering model and we don’t see the benefit -whether it is the AAP kid, the gen Ed kid or the teacher.  It doesn’t seem effective.  We would have moved to Center but it is the last year of ES.[/quote]

For DS, who is in local level IV, the math component is a separate class that combines level IV students with the level III kids who are strong in math (about a 50-50 split).  DD's center classes are level IV-only and seem to move faster.  One of DS's friends started in LLIV and transferred to the center for 5th grade.  Per the mom, he was behind and had lots of catching up to do.  Center has significantly more math homework.

Other level IV material is provided only three days a week via pull-out for DS. The rest of the time he does the same things Gen Ed does.  DD gets level IV content in all subjects, full-time.  [/quote]

That is a nice way at least to do the math and LLIV, and I would find that a decent option while acknowledging full time LIV still seems better.

However, our base (newly offering LLIV this year) is doing cluster model and very explicitly is NOT doing a LIII push-in like this. It is truly just mixed gen ed. - including for math. (This is a base that formerly started adv math in 5th grade incidentally.) I just do not see that as a good replacement for the center system. AAP kids get less and so does everyone else in the classroom where the teacher suddenly has to differentiate (somehow) even more but with the same resources. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics