Reply to S/O: How hard should I be working

Forum Index » Diet, Nutrition & Weight Loss

Reply to "S/O: How hard should I be working"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]SAME OP. I'm about a year into the peloton and this month in particular I've just let go of some of my metrics, which has been hard for me! But yeah, you're right, I'm still working out and feeling good! And it totally still counts. I feel like getting to this point of like, 'every workout doesn't need to be an all out leave me on the floor huffing and puffing effort' is actually a sign of it being a PERMANENT change in my life.

I can't peak forever! But I want to keep exercising forever! I have been confused about people who target zone 3/4 for their primary HR zones while working out because when I'm going, I'm in zone 5 a LOT and mostly in high 4. But lately I've been realizing, but hey, you know what is sustainable as heck? A lot of zone 3 workouts! Now that I've lost a lot of weight and am trying to envision what this all looks like long term I'm cool with the 'moderate workout'. I think its a sign of success!

And LOL at the pp saying its not a good workout, ok, sure. [/quote]

[b]I guess its a good workout for the average person. But at the more advanced levels of fitness, bike alone is not a workout. It's decent cardio but doesn't burn that many calories. And not a full body workout. It's basically a warm up[/b].[/quote]

Such an annoying, unhelpful comment! Lots of "real" athletes at "advanced levels of fitness" use peloton (Usain Bolt, Michael Phelps, for example). It is an excellent cardio machine and platform, and so if you're trying to get a good cardio workout, you can get a good workout on a Peloton. Obviously, if you're trying to gain huge biceps or have some other non-cardio based goal (or non-cycling based goal), it won't help with that. [/quote]

That’s my point. Cycling is good cardio and has its place in a well rounded fitness program. My point is bike alone is not going to get you in shape no matter how “hard” you work. Yes, it will improve cardiovascular endurance. When I say in shape, I mean aesthetically. I can’t speak for anyone else but if I’m spending that much time working out I want to *look* like I work out. But I know everyone doesn’t have the same goals. [/quote]

That is a ridiculous goal and standard for working out frankly. Every single person age 10-80 benefits from some cardio. It will improve their health. Very very very few people statistically are capable of achieving some defined muscular body like you are describing. As someone who has gone from 210 pounds to 160 pounds using this crappy workout program I don’t have big guns but look a helluva lot better and much more importantly I feel a LOT better.

People like you keep people like the old me on the sofa. Fitness is more than a rock hard bod. Kind empathetic humans who aren’t overly focused on their own six pack get this.[/quote]

Okay I am being a bit overly harsh - my apologies. I respect your journey and thats a great accomplishment.

I am not knocking cardio - I have been a runner for 20 years and love cycling. My only point was that cardio is the be all and end all to getting in shape. Does it have other benefits, absolutely but it has very little impact on losing fat. Cardio burns muscle - basically counterproductive to burning fat. It should be a part of any fitness program, but the real benefits come from getting the proper nutrition and building strength. [/quote]

For 80% of the people using the peloton it does in fact burn fat and vastly improve their health. These people aren’t already in fitness range for body fat.

Maybe you can tell us how many people your dunked on that were walking at the last turkey trot.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics