Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Biglaw partnership: generational shift or misinformation? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Things have shifted. I graduated in 2005. While I was in biglaw as an associate in 2005-2013, it was a defense mechanism for many to say "oh I don't want to be partner" - everyone knew that was laughable when you were slogging as an 8th year (because the ones who REALLY didn't want it left by year 4). If you were slogging as an 8th year you WANTED it and were not going to turn it down, but you said it to save face because such a small % was making partner - at least in NYC in litigation in that 2010-2014 timeframe. So it was the school yard game of - I don't want it anyway. Fast forward like 2-3 years, the firms had SO MUCH more work that really they NEEDED people to stay and make partner and that generation that's really only 2-3 years younger than me started quitting in droves even as senior associates, even after slogging for 7-8 years. IDK what it was - whether it was quantity of work or just they were less scared to say - sorry I want to put my life or family first and that'll never happen as partner. But those classes of 2007-08 graduates were the first to really reject partnership; you also wonder if it's a "loyalty" thing - they graduated in a recession, constantly feared job loss, many did lose offers at their original firms so they started biglaw with a sour note and a thought of - make the $$$ while it's "easy" (relatively)but get out before the lifelong business generation pressure starts. That trend has continued for the last 5ish years and the quality of associate that makes partner now is a touch lower. People were turned down for absurd reasons in 2010-2013 simply because the firms did not want to make them partner; and the people making it now are objectively less good than the ones we turned down - yet we just need the bodies in the partnership. The cycle has shifted.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics