Reply to TJ admissions - Student Portrait Sheet

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "TJ admissions - Student Portrait Sheet"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]My understanding is that the SPS is written as part of the timed, monitored administration along with the problem-solving essay.  While the specifics of the problem-solving essay can't be known in advance, the specifics of the SPS obviously can.  It would make sense to plan in advance what one plans to include in the SPS.  What I can't seem to find, though, is whether an outline is permitted to be brought to the testing site or whether it must be done entirely from memory.  Any insight into the process would be appreciated.

Thanks![/quote]

The SPS is graded using a propriety method, the Random Acceptance Criteria Evaluation (RACE), the specifics of which cannot be shared with the public.[/quote]

Troll[/quote]

It’s not trolling if it’s true. The admissions process uses a ‘proprietary process’ for grading the SIS and essay they will not share with the public.[/quote]

The fact that they don't share the process..... which by the way, is the case for [i]literally every major academic institution in America[/i].... doesn't mean that you aren't a bitter troll who is making up garbage.[/quote]

The lawsuit will give insight into that process.  FCPS says its race-blind.  We will know for certain in a few months.  [/quote]

I'm gonna go out on a limb and bet that you won't.

If there were a means to compel public institutions to reveal their proprietary admissions processes, you'd see them publicly posted with regard to literally hundreds of universities.

The lawsuit is going to evaluate the question of whether or not FCPS can use geographic representation quotas in their admissions processes. It's well established that they can, but the question will basically be "was Brabrand doing this entirely because of too many Asians".

The motion for injunctive relief was denied and the process for the Class of 2026 is going to go on as scheduled without interruption. Brabrand is resigning after this year and the next superintendent will have a clean slate from which to operate this legal process.

The Coalition for the Status Quo might very well win the case and get a judge to tell them that they're right - in which case, congratulations - but there will be no impact on the admissions process in future years until a new School Board is elected in November of 2023. The present School Board will just find another way to do the same thing if they're required to do so.[/quote]

From what has happened in the case so far, the Coalition has conceded that the SES graders did not know the race or gender of the students.  The case is going forward on the claim that the 1.5% rule and getting rid of the math test were done to intentionally ensure fewer Asians are admitted and that other races are admitted instead.  [/quote]

Of course this has no merit and we'll get laughed out of court hopefully they'll be stuck with the huge bill for their legal costs.[/quote]

No merit as to what?  As in the changes were not designed to reduce the number of Asians?  Or the changes were done to reduce the number of Asians but was done in a lawful way?  Or something else?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics