Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "The Absurdity of U.S. News College Rankings - Per Malcolm Gladwell"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The world rankings are more logical and respected globally.[/quote] This is simply not true. The global rankings are even more nonsensical, and one of them, QS, is notorious for its British bias.[/quote] The global rankings do a good job of what they are for: ranking reputations of universities globally. No one thinks that Vanderbilt or Duke are more reputed institutions than UC Berkeley, but the undergraduate rankings incorrectly ranks it as such. The National Universities ranking is a misnomer. It should obviously be renamed to indicate it ranks based on undergraduate studies specifically. [/quote] +1. While rankings like QS are survey-heavy and biased in favor of UK universities, US News Global, ARWU, and CWUR are research-based and is a very accurate measure of 1. how much a school is contributing towards academic progress and 2. the overall global reputation within academia (of course not laymen prestige). Most of the other countries construct school prestige out of these factors, and it’s really only the US that ignorantly thinks that laymen undergrad prestige is the only thing out there. No idea why.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics