Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He went to Trinity College so he just sounds bitter to me.
University of Toronto. That’s an excellent school.
Dumbass thinks he when to Trinity in Hartford.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He went to Trinity College so he just sounds bitter to me.
University of Toronto. That’s an excellent school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Berkeley grads hold onto the global rankings as if their lives depended on it. Can you imagine the inner turmoil and angst if Berkeley were to fall down the global rankings, too? Never seen a group of more insecure alums in my life. And that insecurity often reveals itself in nasty ways.
This statement needs to be restricted to a certain group of Berkeley grads, namely the undergraduates. We all know that global rankings put emphasis on graduate school research, and in that sphere, there are very few schools that are better than Berkeley.
Of course, Berkeley Ph.D. students have every reason to mention the global rankings, because that is an accurate representation of their achievement. A Berkeley Ph.D. student is more elite than a Duke or Vanderbilt Ph.D. student, and there's no way to argue against this.
Where I agree with you, are those insecure undergrads who mention the global rankings as if it's a representation of their eliteness. They take credit for something they don't deserve, i.e. the elite nature of the grad programs at Berkeley. They are nasty indeed.
Anonymous wrote:Berkeley grads hold onto the global rankings as if their lives depended on it. Can you imagine the inner turmoil and angst if Berkeley were to fall down the global rankings, too? Never seen a group of more insecure alums in my life. And that insecurity often reveals itself in nasty ways.
Anonymous wrote:Berkeley grads hold onto the global rankings as if their lives depended on it. Can you imagine the inner turmoil and angst if Berkeley were to fall down the global rankings, too? Never seen a group of more insecure alums in my life. And that insecurity often reveals itself in nasty ways.
Anonymous wrote:He went to Trinity College so he just sounds bitter to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The world rankings are more logical and respected globally.
This is simply not true. The global rankings are even more nonsensical, and one of them, QS, is notorious for its British bias.
The global rankings do a good job of what they are for: ranking reputations of universities globally.
No one thinks that Vanderbilt or Duke are more reputed institutions than UC Berkeley, but the undergraduate rankings incorrectly ranks it as such.
The National Universities ranking is a misnomer. It should obviously be renamed to indicate it ranks based on undergraduate studies specifically.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The world rankings are more logical and respected globally.
This is simply not true. The global rankings are even more nonsensical, and one of them, QS, is notorious for its British bias.
The global rankings do a good job of what they are for: ranking reputations of universities globally.
No one thinks that Vanderbilt or Duke are more reputed institutions than UC Berkeley, but the undergraduate rankings incorrectly ranks it as such.
The National Universities ranking is a misnomer. It should obviously be renamed to indicate it ranks based on undergraduate studies specifically.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The world rankings are more logical and respected globally.
This is simply not true. The global rankings are even more nonsensical, and one of them, QS, is notorious for its British bias.