Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Include FSIQ in Initial Packet?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’m not angry my kid is not in AAP. I am disappointed in FCPS. But yes, feel free to attempt to discredit the substance of my accurate characterization of the GBRS with a personal attack suggesting I need therapy. It reveals you do not have a substantive rebuttal. Thank you. [/quote] The holistic approach isn't based entirely on the GBRS, either. The committee is simply looking for something beyond a single score on a test that is very easily prepped. A high score + a good work sample would be enough. Or a high score + some compelling letter of recommendation, parent questionnaire, significant award, or whatever. Yes the process is imperfect, and some small number of truly gifted kids are rejected first round who ought not to be. Those kids all eventually get in on appeals or get in the next year. If the kid has one high test score, but year after year fails to in any way impress the teachers or produce any signs at all of giftedness, it's more likely that the high test score is the aberration than it is that the kid is a stealth genius. Referring to Mensa makes you look a bit desperate. No one takes Mensa seriously, and Mensa membership is pretty meaningless. DYS, triple nine, and many other gifted societies don't accept CogAT scores, because the CogAT is a weak test used only because it's cheap. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics