Reply to Why is Alsobrooks so popular?

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Why is Alsobrooks so popular?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Relationships. You know, two people, together. A relationship.

Are you unfamiliar with the term?

Because it's normative for people to be involved with a significant other. It's what we do.

And anyone who isn't involved in a relationship, or seeking one, is an outlier, and probably is not the person I'd want in a leadership position of any significance.

I want someone normal. Not someone who cannot, or does not, maintain a relationship with a partner. [/quote]

[b]If a person can’t demonstrate that they can be with someone, at least for a while, they have no business trying to be a politician. [/b] [b]Being single for life is more weird than being divorced three times or a serial adulterer [/b]  [/quote]

Really?  Please cite any data suggesting a relationship between relationship status and political career outcomes.

And I can guess I can safely assume who you voted for in 2016, given your valuing of some moral failings over others (even though many of us don't consider being single, e.g., Stacey Abrams, a moral failing--if they can do the job effectively, then that's what matters to many people).

-married with children[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics