Reply to Cordell and Cordell- has anyone delt with this law firm?

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Cordell and Cordell- has anyone delt with this law firm?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]In what way do they despise women?  It's not crazy for them to focus on one side as a specialization and recognizing that, historically, men have often gotten the short end of the stick on family matter issues.  There are also firms that represent women.  Do they inherently hate men?[/quote]

I don’t know if the law firm itself hates women, but many of their clients sure do and they host a forum that is a “safe space” for misogynists to give free legal advice to each other. It just reminds me of a bar in my college town where the owner swore she had nothing against black people, but her clientele was largely violent white supremacists.[/quote]

Someone believing men often get the short end of the stick in divorce proceedings doesn't make them misogynistic, nor does someone being a bit angry and bitter while going through a divorce.  Lots of women feel the exact same way.

It sounds like lots of women on this forum are simply upset that the firm is willing to fight hard for men in divorce proceedings, something plenty other firms do for women and for that matter men.[/quote]

If you haven’t read their forums over a long period of time, you have no idea what you are talking about. It’s more than a bit angry and bitter. There are posters on there who are on divorce number two or three who are promoting 1950s ideals of gender roles and arguing that divorced moms should lose custody for dating. Lots of toxic attitudes about women. No one ever seems to get banned.[/quote]

I read their forums a few years back after they came up in a google search.  It was a fascinating train wreck that
makes it look like DC posters are the epitome of sweetness and light.  There are some seriously angry men on there who see their kids and any romantic partners as possessions.   The general attitude was that those men wanted control over their children’s life not out of the best interests of the children, but to punish their exes who probably had enough of their abusive behavior.

And I’m not one to think mothers should automatically get custody and I generally frown on divorced parents exposing their kids to a series of temporary SOs.

If that translates to the lawyers? I don’t know...but res ipsa loquitur and/or Occum’s razor seems to apply. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics