Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]That reddit recap is hilariously accurate. And I'm someone who often gets accused of being a Lively shill![/quote]

What is the reference “depends how stupid the dummy is” about? Who said or what is it referring to in connection with today’s emergency heating? I am seeing people saying it with laughing emojis. What is context? Thx [/quote]

Wallace was dismissed today for lack of personal jurisdiction so he is no longer a party, but it's without prejudice so Blake may refile and make him a party again. That's an issue because they had planned for his lawyers to depose Blake tomorrow but now he's no longer a party. That would mean for him to depose her, she either had to reschedule her deposition (which is what ended up happening), be deposed again later (heaven forbid) or Wallace would need to be quickly added back as a party. Liman "helpfully" suggested Gottlieb should file a dummy complaint, basically re-file his old complaint (that was dismissed) tonight with the idea he can amend it into the "real" complaint later, basically just for show as a technicality to make Wallace a defendant in this case as of tomorrow morning.

Wallace's attorney Babcock was asked if he is ok with the "dummy" complaint and said "it depends how stupid the dummy is" as a lighthearted and witty comment, to register his disagreement.[/quote]

Liman also offered to reverse the dismissal, which was bizarre.[/quote]

Wait wtf really? I don’t speak legalese so I missed that.[/quote]

Here: https://x.com/innercitypress/status/1945609210382659931 [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics