Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Epstein Files"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I’m 100% confident the list implicates individuals from both major parties—plus celebrities, financiers, and philanthropic elites. It’s not partisan. It’s systemic. Authorities with access to the Epstein files either sat on them, suffered consequences, or both. And maybe—maybe—there were legitimate national security interests in withholding certain names. But the public is right to question why, and why now. Let’s be clear: if suppression was done to avoid mass destabilization, no political actor should be using the existence of this list as a campaign weapon or fear tactic. That’s not safeguarding the country—that’s weaponizing trauma. A man with no history of public service ran for office promising to “expose it all.” If he had the goods and didn’t deliver, that’s either negligence or manipulation. And if he did deliver and the system buried it? That’s even worse. So now what? If everyone’s on the list, we have two choices: 1. Collapse into chaos and finger-pointing, or 2. Build a new coalition of those committed to truth, repair, and justice. We don’t need “common sense.” We need common integrity—something our institutions have burned through. When the full list emerges—and I believe it eventually will—the question won’t be “who’s on it.” It’ll be: What kind of country are we going to be after the reckoning? - Independent[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics