Anonymous
07/18/2025 07:03
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:I’m 100% confident the list implicates individuals from both major parties—plus celebrities, financiers, and philanthropic elites. It’s not partisan. It’s systemic.
Authorities with access to the Epstein files either sat on them, suffered consequences, or both. And maybe—maybe—there were legitimate national security interests in withholding certain names. But the public is right to question why, and why now.
Let’s be clear: if suppression was done to avoid mass destabilization, no political actor should be using the existence of this list as a campaign weapon or fear tactic. That’s not safeguarding the country—that’s weaponizing trauma.
A man with no history of public service ran for office promising to “expose it all.” If he had the goods and didn’t deliver, that’s either negligence or manipulation. And if he did deliver and the system buried it? That’s even worse.
So now what? If everyone’s on the list, we have two choices:
1. Collapse into chaos and finger-pointing, or
2. Build a new coalition of those committed to truth, repair, and justice.
We don’t need “common sense.” We need common integrity—something our institutions have burned through.
When the full list emerges—and I believe it eventually will—the question won’t be “who’s on it.” It’ll be: What kind of country are we going to be after the reckoning?
- Independent
Yes. There is a high probability this was orchestrated for blackmail of our most powerful, rich and influential people.
Anonymous
07/18/2025 02:24
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What I am wondering is how many young males were enticed to the Island. Having sex with a young boy would be a firing squad for trump.
Ask Lindsay about that.
I know you mean Lindsay Graham, but this reminded me of what Trump said about Lindsay Lohan when she was 16.
What a perfectly normal way for the 58 year old father of a 23 year old woman to speak about an 18 year old girl.
Anonymous
07/18/2025 02:22
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What I am wondering is how many young males were enticed to the Island. Having sex with a young boy would be a firing squad for trump.
Ask Lindsay about that.
I know you mean Lindsay Graham, but this reminded me of what Trump said about Lindsay Lohan when she was 16.
Why is the Jewish host Stern getting a pass in all of this? Stern was this way with every guest. He is a degenerate closeted homosexual racist.
What on earth does Stern's religion have to do with anything? Seems we've found the degenerate anti-Semite.
Anonymous
07/18/2025 02:19
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not going to Google that word. Can someone just tell me if it confirms our suspicion that Trump is a oedo?
Democrats were in the thick of gotcha games for 8+ years, and nothing came out. You really think that with all their silly fervor, they would have held back?
Common sense is not common.
It wasn’t gotcha games. It was an attempt to bring to light all of the wildly inappropriate and illegal things Trump has actually done. But you guys did not care. At all. So it makes sense to me that democrats did not want to waste time on this. They figured half the country wouldn’t care, no matter how damning.
THIS. Screamed.
Anonymous
07/18/2025 01:35
Subject: Epstein Files
This may be where the political left and right agree.
Anonymous
07/18/2025 01:30
Subject: Epstein Files
Release the list. I dont GAFF who is on it.
Anonymous
07/18/2025 00:48
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:I’m 100% confident the list implicates individuals from both major parties—plus celebrities, financiers, and philanthropic elites. It’s not partisan. It’s systemic.
Authorities with access to the Epstein files either sat on them, suffered consequences, or both. And maybe—maybe—there were legitimate national security interests in withholding certain names. But the public is right to question why, and why now.
Let’s be clear: if suppression was done to avoid mass destabilization, no political actor should be using the existence of this list as a campaign weapon or fear tactic. That’s not safeguarding the country—that’s weaponizing trauma.
A man with no history of public service ran for office promising to “expose it all.” If he had the goods and didn’t deliver, that’s either negligence or manipulation. And if he did deliver and the system buried it? That’s even worse.
So now what? If everyone’s on the list, we have two choices:
1. Collapse into chaos and finger-pointing, or
2. Build a new coalition of those committed to truth, repair, and justice.
We don’t need “common sense.” We need common integrity—something our institutions have burned through.
When the full list emerges—and I believe it eventually will—the question won’t be “who’s on it.” It’ll be: What kind of country are we going to be after the reckoning?
- Independent
+1. Not only did Bill Barr’s dad help create Epstein, Tony Blinken is also right there. What the f*ck?!
Anonymous
07/18/2025 00:42
Subject: Epstein Files
I’m 100% confident the list implicates individuals from both major parties—plus celebrities, financiers, and philanthropic elites. It’s not partisan. It’s systemic.
Authorities with access to the Epstein files either sat on them, suffered consequences, or both. And maybe—maybe—there were legitimate national security interests in withholding certain names. But the public is right to question why, and why now.
Let’s be clear: if suppression was done to avoid mass destabilization, no political actor should be using the existence of this list as a campaign weapon or fear tactic. That’s not safeguarding the country—that’s weaponizing trauma.
A man with no history of public service ran for office promising to “expose it all.” If he had the goods and didn’t deliver, that’s either negligence or manipulation. And if he did deliver and the system buried it? That’s even worse.
So now what? If everyone’s on the list, we have two choices:
1. Collapse into chaos and finger-pointing, or
2. Build a new coalition of those committed to truth, repair, and justice.
We don’t need “common sense.” We need common integrity—something our institutions have burned through.
When the full list emerges—and I believe it eventually will—the question won’t be “who’s on it.” It’ll be: What kind of country are we going to be after the reckoning?
- Independent
Authorities with access to the Epstein files either sat on them, suffered consequences, or both. And maybe—maybe—there were legitimate national security interests in withholding certain names. But the public is right to question why, and why now.
Let’s be clear: if suppression was done to avoid mass destabilization, no political actor should be using the existence of this list as a campaign weapon or fear tactic. That’s not safeguarding the country—that’s weaponizing trauma.
A man with no history of public service ran for office promising to “expose it all.” If he had the goods and didn’t deliver, that’s either negligence or manipulation. And if he did deliver and the system buried it? That’s even worse.
So now what? If everyone’s on the list, we have two choices:
1. Collapse into chaos and finger-pointing, or
2. Build a new coalition of those committed to truth, repair, and justice.
We don’t need “common sense.” We need common integrity—something our institutions have burned through.
When the full list emerges—and I believe it eventually will—the question won’t be “who’s on it.” It’ll be: What kind of country are we going to be after the reckoning?
- Independent
Anonymous
07/18/2025 00:25
Subject: Epstein Files
Trump doesn’t even know or believe he’s a pedo or rapist. He has excuses and entitlement. MAGA will go right along with him.
Anonymous
07/18/2025 00:24
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:I have to say, I am just baffled by this whole thing. It's so completely obvious to me Trump is a rapist and likely incestuous pervert (not an Ivanka fan but I feel for her a touch I think she's
Cut me off. Definitely been sexually abused. But this crap has been obvious for a decade+ so why the morality police now? Rape and incest is basically a key part of the MAGA platform. The outrage is surprising.
On a separate note, those pics with these teens are damning. Im a woman who probably could have passed for 20 at 14 but...yikes. Those girls look very, very young.
Anonymous
07/18/2025 00:20
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What I am wondering is how many young males were enticed to the Island. Having sex with a young boy would be a firing squad for trump.
Ask Lindsay about that.
I know you mean Lindsay Graham, but this reminded me of what Trump said about Lindsay Lohan when she was 16.
Why is the Jewish host Stern getting a pass in all of this? Stern was this way with every guest. He is a degenerate closeted homosexual racist.
If Stern was so disgusting why did Trump appear on his show dozens and dozens of times?
They are BOTH immoral Godless deviants. Literally the lowest of the low trash.
Anonymous
07/18/2025 00:18
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What I am wondering is how many young males were enticed to the Island. Having sex with a young boy would be a firing squad for trump.
Ask Lindsay about that.
I know you mean Lindsay Graham, but this reminded me of what Trump said about Lindsay Lohan when she was 16.
Why is the Jewish host Stern getting a pass in all of this? Stern was this way with every guest. He is a degenerate closeted homosexual racist.
Howard Stern has completely reformed. Trump is still the same POS he was in this clip, just older and dumber.
Stern is married to a female beard after a 40 year career of depravity and racism. He is not reformed, he is a lifelong sicko right there with Trump.
Anonymous
07/18/2025 00:18
Subject: Epstein Files
I have to say, I am just baffled by this whole thing. It's so completely obvious to me Trump is a rapist and likely incestuous pervert (not an Ivanka fan but I feel for her a touch I think she's
Anonymous
Anonymous
07/18/2025 00:13
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:The problem is that his supporters will have to admit to themselves that they’ve been conned. And it’s the biggest con in history. I’m not hopeful they will do that. More likely they will make up a new story or excuse to tell themselves. Trump just has to figure out which one works. You can see he’s trying new ones out every day.
Conned. The first step is admitting you have a problem.
Mass message tools for voters about how its not a terrible thing to be a victim, provide awareness training via social media without directly finger pointing, and remind voters that if they can forgive the systemic failure of this system, and themselves, we can forgive them, but that means a strict no-tolerance policy for our babies. If that could happen, a new collective could agree to a path forward starting with something bi-partisan you agree upon: the lives of living babies being valued, and that value being something we can mutually define/clarify politically, . Children are innocent and deserve protection from the exploitation of powerful people. A select few do not get the right to normalize acceptance of child rape, coercion, and abuse because they have wealth.
You can’t fake influence. There are many forms of currency.. not just $.
- Independent