Reply to Mass Deportation: this is going to be expensive

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Mass Deportation: this is going to be expensive "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Clearly mass deportation not that expensive if you don't have to worry about due process or the Constitution.[/quote

You start by canceling Biden's illegal paroles.  Getting them to self-deport would be far cheaper, but more likely these people won't leave on their own.
[/quote]

Illegal how? 
I think this is the actual statute that makes it legal:

5)(A) The Secretary of Homeland Security may, except as provided in subparagraph (B) or in section 1184(f) of this title, in his discretion parole into the United States temporarily under such conditions as he may prescribe only on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit any alien applying for admission to the United States, but such parole of such alien shall not be regarded as an admission of the alien and when the purposes of such parole shall, in the opinion of the Secretary of Homeland Security, have been served the alien shall forthwith return or be returned to the custody from which he was paroled and thereafter his case shall continue to be dealt with in the same manner as that of any other applicant for admission to the United States.

(B) The Secretary of Homeland Security may not parole into the United States an alien who is a refugee unless the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that compelling reasons in the public interest with respect to that particular alien require that the alien be paroled into the United States rather than be admitted as a refugee under section 1157 of this title.

(1184(f) has to do with seagoing vessels and aircraft.

So of course parole may be removed, but it is hardly illegal in the first place.

It is incredibly frustrating to hear how simplistic people are about this stuff. Let's consider the Haitians working in Springfield (who are not, in fact, eating pets). They fulfill labor needs for the area. Their presence has been lawful. Now, apparently, their protected status has been or is being removed. How is this starting with the "worst of the worst" or whatever? How is shipping people who have CURRENT asylum cases pending? How is going after green card holders who have long ago misdemeanors? How is this being done without deference to actual court proceedings involving accused individuals?

Imagine if the egg-layer culling for bird flu had taken place in this manner. Officials would show up at random chicken farms, backyard chicken coops, county fair "fancy poultry" exhibitions, wildlife rescue programs, wildlife refuges during duck hunting season, endangered species programs to reintroduce birds (like those great blue herons they have to teach to fly a migration route), dovecotes, and probably snatch a bunch of bald-headed eagles without regard for actual bird flu outbreaks. That's what it would look like.

The removal of aliens has been defined by a chaos-ridden free-for-all. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics