Reply to 2024 JonBenet Documentary

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "2024 JonBenet Documentary"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]The taser is really puzzling and there is no doubt that it is a taser. If the police did the same thing that Detective Lou Smith did and showed samples of the taser on pig skin versus the train track on pig skin, they need to present that information. Because I have seen those kinds of train tracks and they would not leave the marks that were on her head and neck. The marks perfectly match the combination of a rectangle and a circle that is a taser, not the more precise shapes that a train track would make.

I just don’t see why anyone in the family would taser the child.

The other thing that irritates me is how much misinformation is floating around and taken as gospel. I did not know until the documentary that John never had a private plane. If you search John’s private plane on Google, you will find tons of Reddit threads going really deep into the private plane. The investigative reporter admitted that he got a tip from the police that John had a private plane, did not confirm with a second source which he usually does, published it, and admitted he was wrong and it felt bad for it.

John Ramsey ran a $1 billion company, which means he’s a success and does well but it’s not private plane money. His estimated net worth of the time was about $6 million, which is probably about 9 million today. Not private plane money. People with private planes don’t get $118,000 bonuses lol. My husband‘s bonus is a lot more than that and trust me we don’t have a plane. So it’s just baffling to me that there are all these details out there other people accept as real that are just didn’t happen.

Someone upthread said that the kids were in the train room to look for presents from John’s older kids. But that doesn’t pass either. It was December 25, most people open presents in the morning, not at the end of the night. And why would the presents not be under the tree at this point, and if they were flying to John’s kids family then next morning why wouldn’t they just open presents with the family. It doesn’t make sense.

The other puzzling thing is why the family is so adamant that the police reopen the case and further test the DNA. John Ramsey is spending the end of his life pushing for this as is his oldest son. If the family did it, why would they be doing this? The Boulder police seem content to let this lie. I just don’t know why you would want to ruffle feathers if someone in your family did it.

Finally, the last thing that bothered me is, I thought John Karr had an alibi, but I can’t find one online. I thought he was ruled out because of an alibi but it seems like he was ruled out because the DNA didn’t match. But the DNA matches no one, and if they’re now open to the premise that the DNA is not enough to rule anyone out, why are they ruling him out? The fact that the housekeeper had seen him in the family. garage years prior is really spooky. He seemed to be stalking the family and he seemed to know intimate details about how she was killed and even the nickname of her grandmother, which had never been publicly made available. It seems like he’s the most plausible person, but I’m not sure if he has an airtight alibi or not. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics