Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "Why do atheists post on the Religion forum?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]They want to change your mind and make sure to take people away from their God. It's pretty evil in my opinion. [/quote] That's because you are brainwashed, and you do not realize the hard your beliefs are doing to the world (and have for a long time). Open your eyes and see that there is insufficient evidence to believe there is a god - certainly not to the point where you need to enforce these crazy bronze-age beliefs on others through public policy and societal pressures. That is TRUE evil. REAL evil. Evil that you put on REAL humans EVERY DAY.[/quote] Well, I am atheist and think atheists like you are evil, unintelligent, and naive. Frankly I would rather converse with believers and find your comments to be supremely stupid and ill-informed.[/quote] DP. The PP's comments are certainly abrasive and rude, but they are not stupid or ill-informed. [/quote] DP. They may not be stupid, but they contain no actual proof for the assertions, but rely on logical fallacies and assumptions that the readers have the exact same priors. To call all religions "crazy bronze-aged beliefs" is an ad hominem attack against religion as a whole, not a solid logical proof. PP didn't bring forth a single example of the religious trying to enforce beliefs through societal pressure or public policy, and certainly did not make a case that the religious do this more than the non-believers. Most people can probably easily find these people, however, since the media enjoys nutpicking, so I'll grant that they exist. But to go from the specific cases to the generalization PP did is a hasty generalization fallacy. But for the sake of the argument, let's even try granting that the non-religious don't try to weaponize culture, PP has no where made the case that they person [i]they[/i] quoted wants to do any of that. They have no proof for that. At all.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics