Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Widening 355 in MoCo"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It is so sad to see otherwise smart people be so dumb about planning and transportation. I remember when 270 was 2 lanes in each direction. For 45 years, the county has expanded the number of lanes, the local lanes, the X crossover exchanges, and yet, we still have a lot of bumper to bumper car traffic with corresponding dirty air and health impacts. Time to do something else, what has been happening since the 1970's clearly isn't working.[/quote] Ah, but part of that is due to the bottleneck when the lanes go back down to 2 past Germantown. What "something else" do you propose? Just let it keep getting worse until the highways around here are as bad as I-95 in CT?[/quote] This is where we say: transit and other ways to get around without a car, plus land use to enable it. And then you say: no, roads for cars. [/quote] Most of us just want to get to where we need to go. The problem is that suburbs were largely built around car transportation. Expanding public transport to serve all neighborhoods in a way that is efficient enough to meaningfully reduce the number of cars on the road would be very expensive. I metro to work, but I end up driving to the station because I need to drop one kid at daycare and the other at before care and its all too far apart to walk. DH does not have a logical public transport option to work (would involve a long metro ride on two lines and an infrequent bus). But his commute around the beltway takes longer and longer in the afternoon and there's no solution in sight. The most "walkable" communities are often the most expensive, which is another reason why people end up living further and further out.[/quote] The most walkable communities are often the most expensive, because demand for walkable communities way exceeds supply. The solution is to increase the supply of walkable communities, by making more communities more walkable.[/quote] but their jobs aren't near the walkable communities that they live in. Hence the need for their cars to get to work.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics