Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Jurors explain why they sided with Johnny Depp"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]One of the jurors admitted that they thought they both abused each other. Ok fine, no one said she was perfect. However, if he abused her, then she did not defame him by saying she was a victim of domestic abuse. How do people not get this? [/quote] Perhaps, but did she not also accuse Depp of raping her with a bottle in the op-Ed? I don’t think anyone has said they believe that allegation, which was also apart of the civil suit. [/quote] his name is not even in the Op Ed and there are no details... the headline, which was written by WAPO, says "sexual violence" but there are no details[/quote] Sure and if that’s what she/her lawyers had argued, that would be relevant. But she got up in the witness stand and told the jury about the sexual violence she allegedly experienced at the hands of Depp, right? I think on the face of it, she should have won but what she got up and said in court lost her the case.[/quote] Exactly! She actually said "that's why I wrote the oped about him". [/quote] So was she lying when she said the Op-Ed wasn’t about Depp or was she lying when she said it was about him?[/quote] A charitable (to her) explanation would be that she wrote it about her experience, which was at least partly due to him, however she did not name him and she was aiming to address a larger, more universal societal problem. Since she had some abuse as a child and maybe other bad experiences (?), she could have done a better (for her!) explanation, but she did not. [/quote] What does the above have to do with the question you responded to. She has claimed for years the Op-Ed wasn’t about him. But then on the stand she says it was about him. Jurors have to make their decision based on the facts presented to them. And the facts were that Amber was a liar. [/quote] many people have said that the law and even the facts were good for AH but that her own testimony was not in her favor![/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics