Reply to Muriel Bowser

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Muriel Bowser"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

Head of DC National Guard, William Walker. Today's Post. Youre welcome!:

[b]Walker said one takeaway [/b]from the Jan. 6 riot should be that when in doubt, [b]city[/b] [b]and federal authorities [/b][b]should always[/b] err on the side of requesting a contingency of National Guard troops to be at the ready in advance, even if they don’t end up being used.
"[/quote]

I just thought I'd highlight the rest of it for you -- the "and federal authorities" part.  As you said to a PP: You're welcome.

Curious, why did you highlight "city" while completely ignoring "federal authorities"?  Is it something personal with Mayor Bowser that stops you from fully reading, or perhaps fully understanding even the quotes that you post yourself?

Also curious:  Are you actively advocating for DC statehood?  So that the Mayor can become a Governor and actually have some of the authority and powers that you clearly believe someone in her position should have?[/quote]

Because this thread is in DC Metro Politics and titled "Bowser". OF COURSE  the Feds share culpability, as has been mentioned MANY times in this thread and in threads in National Politics.[/quote]

Well, at least you're consistent in your over-focusing.  I hope you can appreciate that others often prefer stuff like [b]contexts and actual facts[/b].  
[/quote]

So are you "Civilian-splainin'" the HEAD of the DC National Guard?  :roll:  :lol: [/quote]

No, just you, and your curious inability to look beyond your current grasp of the situation. [/quote]

So YOU grasp the "facts and context" better than the Head of the DC National Guard who testified yesterday that the city/Bowser could have better managed (in coordination with the Feds) the deployment of prepared NG for 1/6, and should apply lessons learned moving forward. His words, not mine. So you are arguing with his take of the situation.[/quote]

Your quite says "city and federal authorities should err.." Not "city authorities (in coordination with federal authorities)" should err..." [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics