Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "Rank the Top 10 NoVa High Schools"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The Challenge Index hasn't been updated this year. This is a more recent assessment of the top high schools in the state. https://www.usnews.com/education/best-high-schools/virginia[/quote] It is not a better list, it is a different list.[/quote] It’s open to debate whether it’s a better methodology. It is a fact that it was published more recently.[/quote] Yes. It is a list that is published more recently. But, it is a crap list: it ranks on a college readiness index they define, only they throw out certain schools because a sub-group does badly. I am sorry if one group does bad, but if the overall college readiness index says 75%, it should be listed in the place as 75%. Skip the gold medal, maybe.... [/quote] It's not a crap list because it declines to rank schools that are doing a below-average job with their minority and low-income students (Yorktown and Madison being the prime examples). People pay attention to the US News ratings and maybe this will give those schools an incentive to do better. If you want a list that goes solely by college readiness (students both taking and passing AP/IB courses), you can look at the E&E rating on the Washington Post site. The top 10 NoVa public schools by E&E rating (TJHSST is not ranked because it's a magnet) are: 1. George Mason 2. H-B Woodlawn 3. Langley 4. McLean 5. Madison 6. Yorktown 7. Marshall 8. Oakton 9. Robinson 10. Woodson [/quote] Here is why it is a crap list. I have dug into the numbers. A school that was excluded because of FARMS performance (underprivileged) has a 90% pass rate on Non-ESL, but 60% on ESL kids. All of the schools in the county have similar rates. The only difference is some schools have a higher percentage of FARMs kids that are also ESL. At Madison, 10% FARMS, but 55% of the FARMS kids are ESL. That leads to a 73% pass rate. By comparison, Oakton, which is ranked #6 in the state, and a gold Medal recipient is 40% of FARMS kids are ESL, which gives them a demographically, 76% pass rate for FARMS. If Madison had more FARMS that were not ESL, they would be between Oakton and McLean. The problem is non-english speakers or limited English speakers have problems in school. This means that the fact that Madison's poor region is almost 60% immigrant is what hurts them. [/quote] No one from Madison had an issue with US News rankings when Madison was in the top 10. If you have a problem with this list, you should have a problem with any. Holding other schools' demographics constant, while adjusting Madison's demographics to "cure" the issues that led Madison to be unranked or to be ranked lower, is an exercise that could be repeated by schools that face far more challenges than Madison. [/quote] You are missing the point. The same issues effect all of the schools. The problem is 60% of FARMS are non English speakers for Madison; it is 40% for oakton, etc. Most schools have the English speaking FARMS kids performing almost as well as the English Speaking non-farms kids. [/quote] Poor Madison. Maybe if Vienna were more welcoming to FARMS families, Madison wouldn't have to worry so much about having the wrong balance of low-income students. Anyway, you mean "affect," not "effect," and it's up to the school to work with the students that go there. [/quote] The problem with the rankings is they treat all FARMS kids the same. Some schools (Madison and Yorktown), the majority of FARMS kids are non-english speakers. FCPS wide, that cohort is about 60% proficient. In FCPS, the % of FARMS kids that pass can be estimated by a simple formula: F=number of FARMS, N=number of non-native English speakers. %FARMS PASSING=(N*.6+ (F-N)*.92)/F*100. This holds for every school I have examined. The specific issue is USNews excludes any school is below state means (74%). So a small change in demographics changes a school from gold medalist to unranked. This is why it the USNEWS ranking is CRAP. School wide, Madison is at about 90% proficient. That includes everyone, including the underprivileged (FARMS). The FARMS are then ranked separately. They are trying to assess how they handle the underprivileged students, which is a worthy goal, but not all underprivileged are the same. [/quote] +1 Madison is very welcoming to FARMS kids -- you can be giving and gracious when you have plenty yourself. They recently set up a food pantry in the school to help those who need a little more. Schools like Madison (and Thoreau) have PTAs that are well-funded -- which means the PTAs can cover the expenses of kids who can't afford it on its own. PP is right that not all FARMS kids can be colored with the same brush. An English-speaking kid who comes from a family with limited resources is not facing the same educational challenges as a kid who is just learning English (and probably hasn't had much of a formal education -- or has had bits and pieces of formal education). These ranking systems fail when they penalize the highest performing schools for having a few of the most challenging students. Those students are getting the best education possible. But, if those same students were at a lower performing school, the school wouldn't be penalized as much b/c the DIFFERENCE b/t the most challenging (ESOL+FARMS kids) and the rest of the population (mediocre) isn't as stark as the difference at the better schools. The lesson is either (a) it's better to be a mediocre school all around, or (b) discourage placement of the most challenging kids in high performing schools. Neither is what we should be doing. That's the perverse incentive of penalizing schools when there is a very high performing population and a small, very challenging population. Fortunately, those who know schools like Madison know that it is as high performing as it has always been.... and they will still be welcoming to those who are most-challenged.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics