Anonymous
05/22/2020 17:57
Subject: Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
To our friends on the left: Two things can be true: 1) FBI had a product which named Flynn "openly." If this were leaked, it is illegal. 2) DNI unmasked lots of Obama administration that "unmasked" Flynn and many other Trump associates because they had obtained FISA warrants through false information--that means the warrants were obtained illegally.
Sad
Agreed on the first point.
The bolded is so hysterically misguided and false, I don't even know where to begin.
Agree.
News flash: if you talk to foreign agents, you’re being recorded. The Trump team was too stupid to know better. Flynn really baffles me. Not the traitor part, but the imbecility.
Anonymous
05/22/2020 17:54
Subject: Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser
And now, the GOP AGs from around the country are filing an Amicus brief to the appellate court opposing, wait for it, amicus briefs.
Anonymous
05/22/2020 17:53
Subject: Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser
Anonymous wrote:
To our friends on the left: Two things can be true: 1) FBI had a product which named Flynn "openly." If this were leaked, it is illegal. 2) DNI unmasked lots of Obama administration that "unmasked" Flynn and many other Trump associates because they had obtained FISA warrants through false information--that means the warrants were obtained illegally.
Sad
Agreed on the first point.
The bolded is so hysterically misguided and false, I don't even know where to begin.
Anonymous
Anonymous
05/22/2020 17:39
Subject: Re:Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser
Anonymous
05/22/2020 17:01
Subject: Re:Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser
These sources – nine current and former U.S. officials – stated that Flynn’s “references to the election-related sanctions were explicit.”
So, let's see the transcripts.
Anonymous
Anonymous
05/22/2020 16:47
Subject: Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For our friends on the right, this is how the GOP operates, so you understand how you are being lied to and inflamed to bring half truths and misleading information to boards like this and to your "outraged" conversations.
This is the CBS tweet/report from earlier this month:
Understand the difference between what the DOJ has and controls, versus what the DNI has and controls. DOJ= Barr and DNI= Grenell (until today).
Richard Grenell released the list of "unmaskers" which actually had nothing to do with the Kislyak call that resulted in Flynn's guilty plea.
Why? Because it wasn't an IC product, it was an FBI product. They released this list to gaslight you. And you have carried the lie to twitter, to this forum, to Facebook and to your personal conversations.
All based on lies and half-truths.
To our friends on the left: Two things can be true: 1) FBI had a product which named Flynn "openly." If this were leaked, it is illegal. 2) DNI unmasked lots of Obama administration that "unmasked" Flynn and many other Trump associates because they had obtained FISA warrants through false information--that means the warrants were obtained illegally.
Sad
It was leaked. And it is illegal.
And, it seems, by more than one person........
Entous’ reporting on the Flynn-Kislyak conversations became more prevalent after the FBI’s fateful Jan. 24, 2017 interview of Flynn at the White House. On Feb. 9, 2017, Entous and other Washington Post reporters wrote that Flynn discussed sanctions against Russia during the Trump transition period, “contrary to public assertions by Trump officials.”
These sources – nine current and former U.S. officials – stated that Flynn’s “references to the election-related sanctions were explicit.”
Source: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/washington-post-michael-flynn-russia-divisions-opinion
Anonymous
05/22/2020 16:47
Subject: Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For our friends on the right, this is how the GOP operates, so you understand how you are being lied to and inflamed to bring half truths and misleading information to boards like this and to your "outraged" conversations.
This is the CBS tweet/report from earlier this month:
Understand the difference between what the DOJ has and controls, versus what the DNI has and controls. DOJ= Barr and DNI= Grenell (until today).
Richard Grenell released the list of "unmaskers" which actually had nothing to do with the Kislyak call that resulted in Flynn's guilty plea.
Why? Because it wasn't an IC product, it was an FBI product. They released this list to gaslight you. And you have carried the lie to twitter, to this forum, to Facebook and to your personal conversations.
All based on lies and half-truths.
To our friends on the left: Two things can be true: 1) FBI had a product which named Flynn "openly." If this were leaked, it is illegal. 2) DNI unmasked lots of Obama administration that "unmasked" Flynn and many other Trump associates because they had obtained FISA warrants through false information--that means the warrants were obtained illegally.
Sad
It was leaked. And it is illegal.
And, it seems, by more than one person........
Entous’ reporting on the Flynn-Kislyak conversations became more prevalent after the FBI’s fateful Jan. 24, 2017 interview of Flynn at the White House. On Feb. 9, 2017, Entous and other Washington Post reporters wrote that Flynn discussed sanctions against Russia during the Trump transition period, “contrary to public assertions by Trump officials.”
These sources – nine current and former U.S. officials – stated that Flynn’s “references to the election-related sanctions were explicit.”
Anonymous
05/22/2020 16:19
Subject: Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For our friends on the right, this is how the GOP operates, so you understand how you are being lied to and inflamed to bring half truths and misleading information to boards like this and to your "outraged" conversations.
This is the CBS tweet/report from earlier this month:
Understand the difference between what the DOJ has and controls, versus what the DNI has and controls. DOJ= Barr and DNI= Grenell (until today).
Richard Grenell released the list of "unmaskers" which actually had nothing to do with the Kislyak call that resulted in Flynn's guilty plea.
Why? Because it wasn't an IC product, it was an FBI product. They released this list to gaslight you. And you have carried the lie to twitter, to this forum, to Facebook and to your personal conversations.
All based on lies and half-truths.
To our friends on the left: Two things can be true: 1) FBI had a product which named Flynn "openly." If this were leaked, it is illegal. 2) DNI unmasked lots of Obama administration that "unmasked" Flynn and many other Trump associates because they had obtained FISA warrants through false information--that means the warrants were obtained illegally.
Sad
Anonymous
05/22/2020 14:31
Subject: Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser
Anonymous wrote:For our friends on the right, this is how the GOP operates, so you understand how you are being lied to and inflamed to bring half truths and misleading information to boards like this and to your "outraged" conversations.
This is the CBS tweet/report from earlier this month:
Understand the difference between what the DOJ has and controls, versus what the DNI has and controls. DOJ= Barr and DNI= Grenell (until today).
Richard Grenell released the list of "unmaskers" which actually had nothing to do with the Kislyak call that resulted in Flynn's guilty plea.
Why? Because it wasn't an IC product, it was an FBI product. They released this list to gaslight you. And you have carried the lie to twitter, to this forum, to Facebook and to your personal conversations.
All based on lies and half-truths.
Sad
Anonymous
05/22/2020 13:34
Subject: Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser
For our friends on the right, this is how the GOP operates, so you understand how you are being lied to and inflamed to bring half truths and misleading information to boards like this and to your "outraged" conversations.
This is the CBS tweet/report from earlier this month:
Understand the difference between what the DOJ has and controls, versus what the DNI has and controls. DOJ= Barr and DNI= Grenell (until today).
Richard Grenell released the list of "unmaskers" which actually had nothing to do with the Kislyak call that resulted in Flynn's guilty plea.
Why? Because it wasn't an IC product, it was an FBI product. They released this list to gaslight you. And you have carried the lie to twitter, to this forum, to Facebook and to your personal conversations.
All based on lies and half-truths.
This is the CBS tweet/report from earlier this month:
Understand the difference between what the DOJ has and controls, versus what the DNI has and controls. DOJ= Barr and DNI= Grenell (until today).
Richard Grenell released the list of "unmaskers" which actually had nothing to do with the Kislyak call that resulted in Flynn's guilty plea.
Why? Because it wasn't an IC product, it was an FBI product. They released this list to gaslight you. And you have carried the lie to twitter, to this forum, to Facebook and to your personal conversations.
All based on lies and half-truths.
Anonymous
05/22/2020 13:27
Subject: Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amicus filing to the Appeals court:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Fh3mRD4Qp4IlNSMX88FoNgaZmbtm2DrO/view
It sort of blows Fokker out of the water.
Were they invited to file one? Doubt it will be accepted.
Yes. They were invited.
Where? I didn't see an invitation to them, in the Appeals Court order. Only Sullivan and DOJ.
Anonymous
05/22/2020 13:24
Subject: Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Amicus filing to the Appeals court:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Fh3mRD4Qp4IlNSMX88FoNgaZmbtm2DrO/view
It sort of blows Fokker out of the water.
Were they invited to file one? Doubt it will be accepted.
Yes. They were invited.
Anonymous
05/22/2020 12:59
Subject: Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser
Anonymous wrote:Amicus filing to the Appeals court:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Fh3mRD4Qp4IlNSMX88FoNgaZmbtm2DrO/view
It sort of blows Fokker out of the water.
Were they invited to file one? Doubt it will be accepted.