Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Jen Hatmaker"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Good night. Tyler is listed in the acknowledgement section of the cookbook. Did she really say that she met him after it was published? And Julie's apology was nearly perfect until she had to mention that the BOLDED reference to her in Jen's book, BOLDLY stating that Julie had contacted her kids (not the other way around, which is how it actually played out) was a little self-serving on Julie's part. Jen wrote in the intro the usual boilerplate "some of these events have been altered for continuity, etc" but it was useless as 85% of the book's content was public already. What else in the book was wrong/untrue/in error? Maybe this is why the book fell flat for me, too. She continues to proclaim enlightenment but is delusional and talks out of both sides of her mouth. It's kind of hypocritical. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
