Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Lacrosse
Reply to "2029 Girls"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]No team that’s ever chosen to stick together instead of joining a more established club has ever had proven success with recruiting results. Ever. Those facts do not lie. [/quote]Using your metrics for established, of course. There are new teams in the top 20 every year. There are other longer standing ones, too. Hero's and M&D have been targeted by you Cap crazies lately, saying there are none or nearly none of them on the by far top 3 teams in the country. And you just made that up, so it's not a "stat". GTFOHWTN.[/quote] Don't run your mouth unless you're ready to back it up. Please challenge the accuracy of these stats: Top three teams: UNC: Godine (M&D 2022) Casey (Cap 2020) Levy (M&D 2024 / Daughter of HC) No Hero's players NW: Archer (Cap 2023) No Hero's OR M&D players BC: O’Connor (Cap 2022) Oliver (M&D 2022) Bennett (M&D 2022) No Hero's players[/quote]You're making my point, numnutz. The PP said you have to be on am "established" team or you'll get whitewashed in recruiting. Meanwhile, of 3 "established" teams, one in a steep decline, there's only a triclkle of players out of ~115 rostered players on the even very best teams. It's just more nonsense after nonsense with you folks. And you've posted it like it's awesome now dozens of times.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics