Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm lol'ing at the hundreds of hypocrite lefties in the nytimes.com comment section saying "This is old news! This is 20 years old! Any woman would do the same to protect their family!"[/quote] The majority of women would have dumped him.[/quote] I agree - especially women who shared similar credentials. Can you imagine some of our "best" DCUM female attorneys making excuses for their high-profile husbands? wouldn't happen unless they were completely insecure or so into appearances that they'd be willing to share their husband's penis with the world I do wonder about the women who support Hillary with these excuses that she "did it for the family" or that it was "their personal business." makes me think they married a Bill, too[/quote] Actually, I can seem many dcum high powered attorneys staying in the marriage for outside appearances.[/quote] Right. I know a female judge who stayed with her roving husband. People like PPP always talk about what they would do in similar situations. But she doesn't know what she would or wouldn't do until presented with the deliemma. I would like to think that I would leave, but after knowing some of these supposed strong women PPP reference, I don't know. I pray that I never have to find out. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics