Anonymous
10/06/2016 22:43
Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
And you can call her Madame President. Bite it.
Anonymous
10/06/2016 21:03
Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since when are mistresses "victims"?
Monica.
She wasn't a victim.
Are you calling Monica Lewinsky a liar?
Not that poster. But hell yeah.
Thank God for that BLUE dress!
Anonymous
10/06/2016 21:02
Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since when are mistresses "victims"?
Monica.
She wasn't a victim.
Are you calling Monica Lewinsky a liar?
Not that poster. But hell yeah.
Anonymous
10/06/2016 21:01
Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:Hillary Clinton is married to a cheater. Trump IS a cheater. Sure keep blaming the woman for her husband's wandering eye but excuse Trump.
But, but, but he is a man. We expect that crap from men. Women are supposed to be plus.
Anonymous
10/06/2016 21:00
Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since when are mistresses "victims"?
Monica.
She wasn't a victim.
Are you calling Monica Lewinsky a liar?
Anonymous
10/06/2016 21:00
Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
I am Catholic and against divorce. Once married, forever married, for better or worse. That's all.
Anonymous
10/06/2016 21:00
Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since when are mistresses "victims"?
Monica.
She was definitely not a victim. She was a grown ass woman working on her Master's degree. She was old enough to vote. Old enough to drink. Old enough to go to war. And, old enough to show her thongs to a married man.
Anonymous
10/06/2016 20:49
Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since when are mistresses "victims"?
Monica.
She wasn't a victim.
Anonymous
10/06/2016 20:48
Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a feminist. This article handles her involvement in taking down the women Bill had affairs with with kid gloves. Hillary is ruthless as a politician and THE thing that makes me queasy about her is the way she relentlessly worked to destroy Flowers and Lewinsky. Women who did not deserve to have their names and lives muddied because of her philandering husband. As a feminist this makes me sick. I'm voting for Gary Johnson.
+1
The article missed the alleged rape victims of Bill Clinton and Hillary's intimidation against them. She is an enabler.
This.
Anonymous
10/06/2016 20:47
Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Hillary Clinton is married to a cheater. Trump IS a cheater. Sure keep blaming the woman for her husband's wandering eye but excuse Trump.
Anonymous
10/06/2016 20:43
Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a feminist. This article handles her involvement in taking down the women Bill had affairs with with kid gloves. Hillary is ruthless as a politician and THE thing that makes me queasy about her is the way she relentlessly worked to destroy Flowers and Lewinsky. Women who did not deserve to have their names and lives muddied because of her philandering husband. As a feminist this makes me sick. I'm voting for Gary Johnson.
My 9 year old is better equipped to be president than Gary Johnson. At least my fourth grader knows what's happening in Aleppo and can name several world leaders.
People who vote for Johnson or Stein don't do so with the expectation that either will become president.
It is a protest vote because both Hillary and Trump are unacceptable alternatives. The only other option is not to vote at all or only vote for down ticket candidates.
I am hoping that Johnson and Stein will get enough votes to make a difference in the final outcome.
They will but, who are you hoping they make a difference for, Trump or Clinton. Both Nader and Perdue made differences in those elections as well. Sigh.
Anonymous
10/06/2016 20:39
Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a feminist. This article handles her involvement in taking down the women Bill had affairs with with kid gloves. Hillary is ruthless as a politician and THE thing that makes me queasy about her is the way she relentlessly worked to destroy Flowers and Lewinsky. Women who did not deserve to have their names and lives muddied because of her philandering husband. As a feminist this makes me sick. I'm voting for Gary Johnson.
+1
The article missed the alleged rape victims of Bill Clinton and Hillary's intimidation against them. She is an enabler.
Operative word
Anonymous
10/06/2016 20:38
Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:Since when are mistresses "victims"?
Monica.
Anonymous
10/06/2016 20:35
Subject: Re:About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most thinking women care less about a woman who stayed in a marriage with a cheating spouse whom she shares a child with, and care more about a philanderer who has 3 wives and a rack of kids by 3 different women who is also a sexist obese pig who comments on women's weight.
Most women also care if a woman tosses dirt onto other women in an attempt to make them look like selfish sluts when her husband has a lifetime of affairs.
Well any woman who sleeps with a married man is selfish slut. You act as though the other woman is innocent. I don't excuse the mistress or the husband. They are both sluts.
Anonymous
10/06/2016 20:30
Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm lol'ing at the hundreds of hypocrite lefties in the nytimes.com comment section saying "This is old news! This is 20 years old! Any woman would do the same to protect their family!"
The majority of women would have dumped him.
I agree - especially women who shared similar credentials.
Can you imagine some of our "best" DCUM female attorneys making excuses for their high-profile husbands?
wouldn't happen unless they were completely insecure or so into appearances that they'd be willing to share their husband's penis with the world
I do wonder about the women who support Hillary with these excuses that she "did it for the family" or that it was "their personal business." makes me think they married a Bill, too
Actually, I can seem many dcum high powered attorneys staying in the marriage for outside appearances.
Right. I know a female judge who stayed with her roving husband. People like PPP always talk about what they would do in similar situations. But she doesn't know what she would or wouldn't do until presented with the deliemma. I would like to think that I would leave, but after knowing some of these supposed strong women PPP reference, I don't know. I pray that I never have to find out.