Reply to Arlington proposing to close county gymnastics program

Forum Index » Sports General Discussion

Reply to "Arlington proposing to close county gymnastics program"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It’s not really whether demand is there.  It’s should the county be doing it at all. I don’t really need to pay tax dollars so Larlas can take heavily subsidized gymnastics in prime County space that could be used to serve residents more broadly.  Let alone subsidizing some kind of club gymnastics team.  Who knew that was even a thing.

Private places will fill the gap eventually if the county stops doing it. [/quote]

Barcroft also has baseball facilities. Should we do away with those? What about the many many soccer fields? The $$$ aquatics center and HS pools? Let’s just get rid of all youth programs so your precious tax dollars don’t have to support any of this. 🙄 Clearly we shouldn’t subsidize things you random poster don’t personally use.[/quote]

These facilities (aside from Long Bridge) are likely funding a huge part of their cost from rentals, classes, and use fees. I am most familiar with Yorktown and W&L pools, and they are booked up for 10-12+ hours a day Monday-Sunday, between paid public access, private rentals, APS instructional needs, and APS swim school programs.

Soccer fields and baseball fields are similarly booked up, have lower costs than a purpose built gym where kids can become paralyzed from one simple fall, and are generally situated on land the county does not want to build. The costs are nowhere near comparable to a purpose built elite gymnastics facility which is not accessible at all to the general public. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics