Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's actually 23 wins which is over 50% higher. So not close. You also said they were 6th or worse since joining, which also isn't true they've been 5th 3x out of 4. And played 2 or 3 tight-ish games per year with the top 4 after year 1. And generally they've hammered the teams behind them, which is fully 50% of the league.Anonymous wrote:The heights has 22 wins in the last 3 years and trending downward. Not far off. Why did they join the WCAC?
You sure this is saying what you want it to say about the strength of privates vs publics?
1 win is 50%? Anyway, The Heights have gone from 11 wins (5th) to 7 (tied for 5th/6th) to 5 wins (6th) in a league which should clearly be divided just like their football side. They have an enrollment of less than 300 and joined a league where enrollment is 2-4x higher. 5th or 6th is where they will always land in lacrosse.
I do recognize they have a good group of 27's and will be a little more competitive this year and solidly in 6th place. They are a good team to judge relative strength of public v privates.
Will the Heights dad please stop with the fake objective comments about Heights being anything other than irrelevant in DMV lacrosse
The Heights attack 27 will have 80+ goals this year.
Nobody cares Margaret. Heights is an irrelevant lax program
??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's actually 23 wins which is over 50% higher. So not close. You also said they were 6th or worse since joining, which also isn't true they've been 5th 3x out of 4. And played 2 or 3 tight-ish games per year with the top 4 after year 1. And generally they've hammered the teams behind them, which is fully 50% of the league.Anonymous wrote:The heights has 22 wins in the last 3 years and trending downward. Not far off. Why did they join the WCAC?
You sure this is saying what you want it to say about the strength of privates vs publics?
1 win is 50%? Anyway, The Heights have gone from 11 wins (5th) to 7 (tied for 5th/6th) to 5 wins (6th) in a league which should clearly be divided just like their football side. They have an enrollment of less than 300 and joined a league where enrollment is 2-4x higher. 5th or 6th is where they will always land in lacrosse.
I do recognize they have a good group of 27's and will be a little more competitive this year and solidly in 6th place. They are a good team to judge relative strength of public v privates.
Will the Heights dad please stop with the fake objective comments about Heights being anything other than irrelevant in DMV lacrosse
The Heights attack 27 will have 80+ goals this year.
Nobody cares Margaret. Heights is an irrelevant lax program
Anonymous wrote:All this talk about SJC aggressively recruiting when Prep is equally aggressive.
Mid Year Transfers, and re-classifying boarding recruits are the norm now at the Rockville Pike school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's actually 23 wins which is over 50% higher. So not close. You also said they were 6th or worse since joining, which also isn't true they've been 5th 3x out of 4. And played 2 or 3 tight-ish games per year with the top 4 after year 1. And generally they've hammered the teams behind them, which is fully 50% of the league.Anonymous wrote:The heights has 22 wins in the last 3 years and trending downward. Not far off. Why did they join the WCAC?
You sure this is saying what you want it to say about the strength of privates vs publics?
1 win is 50%? Anyway, The Heights have gone from 11 wins (5th) to 7 (tied for 5th/6th) to 5 wins (6th) in a league which should clearly be divided just like their football side. They have an enrollment of less than 300 and joined a league where enrollment is 2-4x higher. 5th or 6th is where they will always land in lacrosse.
I do recognize they have a good group of 27's and will be a little more competitive this year and solidly in 6th place. They are a good team to judge relative strength of public v privates.
Will the Heights dad please stop with the fake objective comments about Heights being anything other than irrelevant in DMV lacrosse
The Heights attack 27 will have 80+ goals this year.
So 2 schools. 6 - 4 = 2.Anonymous wrote:Not the IAC, just one school. Landon has zero boarding, same with SSSA, Bullis and StA.
rAnonymous wrote:All this talk about SJC aggressively recruiting when Prep is equally aggressive.
Mid Year Transfers, and re-classifying boarding recruits are the norm now at the Rockville Pike school.
Anonymous wrote:How many midyear transfers did St. John’s bring in?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's actually 23 wins which is over 50% higher. So not close. You also said they were 6th or worse since joining, which also isn't true they've been 5th 3x out of 4. And played 2 or 3 tight-ish games per year with the top 4 after year 1. And generally they've hammered the teams behind them, which is fully 50% of the league.Anonymous wrote:The heights has 22 wins in the last 3 years and trending downward. Not far off. Why did they join the WCAC?
You sure this is saying what you want it to say about the strength of privates vs publics?
1 win is 50%? Anyway, The Heights have gone from 11 wins (5th) to 7 (tied for 5th/6th) to 5 wins (6th) in a league which should clearly be divided just like their football side. They have an enrollment of less than 300 and joined a league where enrollment is 2-4x higher. 5th or 6th is where they will always land in lacrosse.
I do recognize they have a good group of 27's and will be a little more competitive this year and solidly in 6th place. They are a good team to judge relative strength of public v privates.
Will the Heights dad please stop with the fake objective comments about Heights being anything other than irrelevant in DMV lacrosse
The Heights attack 27 will have 80+ goals this year.