Reply to Martha

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Martha"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]She is beautiful, smart, ruthless and savvy, but also soulless, without any humility, and zero genuine kindness. Very Connecticut 60's-80's. Awful. My DH was watching this and I had to leave the room. [/quote]

This. I was watching it thinking "who would admire this?" I would much rather be known for my kind soul, my humility, and kindness than be beautiful/smart/rich.[/quote]

+1. Why has this old hag been shoved down our throats for the last 30 to 40 years?[/quote]

Forget about the last 30 to 40, let's just consider the last couple of years.  The heavily photo shopped bathing suit cover of a magazine, the affair reveal and now thirsting for the new sexiest man alive?  Why do older celebrities embarrass themselves trying to stay young, hip and relevant?  I remember when the swim suit cover came out and that evening my husband said Martha Stewart is aging really well and then I showed him a photo of her without lighting, photo editing and that perfect angle, and he said OMG!  I laughed because although she looks great for her age, it is exactly that, her age.  Botox and fillers have got every single woman over 55 that I know thinking they can trick Mother Nature and look thirty, and you cannot.  Face life, turn it back some, but the fillers and botox at some point just look ridiculous.  I now have a friend who has the filler above her cheekbones and it pains me to watch her chew when we have lunch.  It makes her happy so I say nothing, but come on, stop it.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics