Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Lacrosse
Reply to "VEL 2025 Black Division "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]One of the Indy attack, not sure if it was the so-called slasher, was throwing some reckless checks and got called for a slash to the head. I didn't see anyone get thrown out. [/quote] PP Langley parent here. I can confirm this. Yes it was the same attack/ coach kid. Yes he is too wild with the stick, nothing new. Yes a slash, yes hit the helmet, overly dangerous- no. Seen this 1000x before yes- from many players that don’t know how to play D. Penalty called and that would have been the extent of the rough play.[/quote] Different Langley parent here. According to my son, the Indy player was trash talking and skirmishing after game ended but before the handshake line, which resulted in the ref announcing that he is ejected from the NEXT game. This happened at the scorers table which is why parents are not aware of it. But from the parent sideline I could hear this player running his mouth the whole game. For Yorktown's sake, I hope that VEL upholds the ref's decision, so they can have reasonably clean game without one kid trash talking and taking cheap shots all over the field. [/quote] Don't know what to make of this. While I can see this happening there are just a bit of things that do not add up: So, player is trash talking and skirmishing after the game. This [b]rises to the level[/b] of a ref ejecting the player from the next game. However A flag was not thrown which is standard for refs This did not draw enough notice for the people on the parents sideline to notice Additional players did not join in or pull people apart Coaches from either team didn't pull players aside It sounds very fantastical that a ref would eject a player for actions (trash talk etc) that would have been so minor that the people there didn't see anything out the ordinary, but so major that there was an ejection, if they indeed happen. Something just does not add up here. What I do know- If the league is not going to suspend the player, then a coach (dad or not) is not going to do so. If the league says they can play, they do. I know VEL and EB. I have played for EB. If the ref says they are ejected, EB and VEL will definitely support the refs and sit the player. I will withhold my judgement until next week to see if the player plays and I will have my answer to the honesty of the above posts. [/quote] very good points. one possibility is that the post game stuff was minor, but the refs know the player and he is on a watch list based on his past actions.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics