Reply to Perry v Segura

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Perry v Segura"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]. 
No, people aren’t persuaded because you don’t back up your claims with facts.  It’s all emotions, no reason.  
Planned Parenthood, as wonderful as it is,  is not publicizing all that it offers to women in challenging, potentially dangerous situations because they know the Dems always need abortion as a wedge issue.  PP needs to expand its sm presence but it won’t!  I’m frustrated as hell.

My relative is at WashU (Missouri) for a residency and what you claim simply isn’t true.  Med school grads are clamoring to apply there and he is beyond thrilled to be in STL and so is his OB-GYN girlfriend.  [/quote]

Not withstanding the personal experience of your relative and his OB/GYN girlfriend, it actually is facts.

https://hechingerreport.org/abortion-bans-complicate-medical-training-risk-worsening-obgyn-shortages/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2023/04/21/abortion-ban-states-obgyn-residency-applications/
https://www.ama-assn.org/medical-students/preparing-residency/after-dobbs-m4s-face-stark-reality-when-applying-residency

The abortion bans are already terrible for the health of babies and pregnant women, and it will only get worse.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics