Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to " You are tentatively eligible for this series/grade but not referred"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So your wife DID NOT provide any documentation of marriage? That could be it right there. You have to document most claims. Just stating them in the application, or assuming HR can (or is even allowed) to infer things is not a best practice For example, I once applied to an OSD job that I was well qualified for but was not referred. I called the HR POC and was told I was not referred because I did not upload my college and gras school transcript. Now, HR could have inferred this. I was an active duty Army officer and a reserve officer now, positions that require an undergrad degrees. I also went to a master's granting DOD school. However HR needs to see the underlying documentation. A few other observations; 1) you are citing from a presidential EO. Those are not the final implementing instructions. You need to look up the DOD instruction to see how the spousal program actually gets implemented. Everyone can be in the same category. But there might be subcategories of preference within it. This happens. See the DOD policy on eligibility and preference for onbase child development centers. The larger policy sets 4 or 5 categories of preference. However the implementing instructions further divides category 1 into 4 separate buckets. So there is category 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, etc. In practice, only category 1a and 1b get a CDC spot, even though they are all cat 1 preference 2). Your attitude in this thread has been extremely unprofessional. Actual HR feds have been trying to help. Yet your displayed attitude is a mix of aggressive, condescending, arrogant, and dismissive. This is not a recipe for success. [/quote] Ok, this right here. First off, I cited from the EO one time. The rest of the time I have actually copied and pasted CFR. Now if you have some other source, as you say, a DOD instruction, then why don't you provide those. I've read policy on eligibility and I don't see anything that would block her referral. If you are aware of some DOD instruction as you call it that would provide further information, then provide it. Secondly, you haven't read the entire thread if you think I'm the one being unprofessional. Not that it matters. Your attitude is that of someone who doesn't know the answers I'm looking for, but still felt the need to provide your .02. So thanks for you .02. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics