Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Montgomery County is what happens when the Social Justice Warriors take over"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Anyone think crime will skyrocket nowafter the aspen hill incident? I’ve read things saying police are hesitant to do their jos now according to Kevin Lewis[/quote] Yes, the beginnings of depolicing is a real problem. Only person who can fix that is Assistant Chief Jones. Whose been passed over for two finalists who are not competent to run such a large department. [/quote] And what exactly is de-policing?[/quote] Baltimore City. Where the police just stop doing their jobs. The most fragile of our residents will be the ones who suffer. The exact population the acouncil is trying to protect. And the police chief can’t fire anyone thanks to collective bargaining. So many bad cops stay. [/quote] Sorry but I'm not buying that apocalyptic nonsense. Police groups and their supporters advance the de-policing argument to keep the public scared. It's a panic button tactic used to frighten folks into thinking that if we don’t keep police officers happy, they’ll stop protecting us — and “keeping police officers happy” means refraining from criticizing cops and removing all outside oversight, even in clear cases of abuse. It’s a cynical, dangerous argument that not only aims to shame critics into silence, but it besmirches the integrity of conscientious police officers. It suggests that good cops would rather let people die than allow the worst and most abusive of their colleagues to even be criticized, much less held accountable. That's bullshit. If de-policing means less unconstitutional harassment, then let’s have more de-policing. If it means fewer suspicionless stops, mass arrests or harassment for petty offenses, then de-policing is not the end of the world as you infer. Now if if de-policing means cops don’t respond to calls, or disengage from the community entirely, that of course is a lot more problematic HOWEVER, if the majority of officers out here are decent and honorable and dedicated and don't abuse their power as police groups and their supporters say then I doubt such decent, honorable, and dedicated servants of the community would deliberately abandon those they pledged to protect and serve just because (GASP!!) people had the gall to criticize them. Tell em to grow a pair and ask them if they're carrying badges or pansies.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics