Reply to Bad Art Friend

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Bad Art Friend"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

I just got around to reading the article, and while I feel for Dawn and everything she's been through...  I could not stop thinking about the fact that she reached out to the people in the Facebook group she created (to praise her kidney donation) to ask them why they weren't liking her posts more?[/quote]

Yeah, so that was needy and showed poor boundaries and is not great social media behavior. 
But that’s also all it was: Socially awkward. 
It was not bullying, it was not wholesale lying, it was not plagiarism.

- Dawn defender [/quote]

Again this is completely inaccurate. Completely. How many times are we going to do this in this thread?[/quote]

Sorry, which part is inaccurate?
[/quote]

All of it.

She didn’t ask why she wasn’t liking the posts - she saw that Sonya was reading everything by FB metrics auto-displayed for her, and Larson was the only person doing this without otherwise interacting/saying anything, and at this point, Sonya was also acting like she barely remembered Dorland donated the kidney.

Larson and the Grubs in Chunky Monkey were in the equivalent of HR and upper management when they were shit-talking, including talks about siccing writers of color on her, and calling her a pestilence. This included people who investigate HR complaints.

Courtney Milan who of course clerked for the 9th circuit’s greatest nightmare, and writes romance, explained part of the MAD element of the lawsuit, but several lawyers who specialize in these kinds of claims contend it meets every definition of plagiarism.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics