Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is one big game of chess and ECNL is running out of moves [/quote] ECNL is fine for now but MLSN is the top league for boys. If MLSN cared about dominating the youth soccer market they easily could. [b]ECNL girls is also fine for now but parents are starting to figure out that GA is the same thing. The only difference is the clubs involved[/b]. The big unknown right now is if/how NWSL will partner with youth soccer. A working framework has been established by MLS and implemented via MLSN. Logically if NWSL was to follow MLSs footsteps they’d partner with GA and create NWSLN. If this was to happen there would be 20+ ECNL to GA defections year one.[/quote] That bolded part is so wrong.....[/quote] 792 D1 verbal commitments for the 2025 class & breakdown by platform. #ECNL -575 (72.6%) #GirlsAcademy -166 (21%) All Others -27 (3.4%) 🇨🇦 -24 (3%) There’s a twitter handle that is tracking all this.[/quote] Are the above ECNL numbers just girls? I don’t doubt that ECNL girls has more D1 commitments than GA girls, even proportionately to the number of players / teams, but 3.5:1 doesn’t seem right. 575 ECNL boys and girls and 166 GA girls makes more sense to me.[/quote] Just girls. That is the point. Of course you can get recruited in GA. But not like ECNL. [/quote] Ignore the current mess at FCV. Any reasonable person would acknowledge that, on the whole over the last five years, FCV’s GA teams have been as good (not meaningfully better or meaningfully worse) as any of the ECNL teams in the DMV. Similarly, any reasonable person would acknowledge that some portion (top 10%, top quarter, top half?) of their teams could have played on any of the ECNL teams in the DMV. Given that the ECNL is producing 3x the number of D1 players, why did that portion of FCV’s players stay at FCV and not move to an ECNL team?[/quote] BP[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics