Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Roe v Wade struck down"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Childless politicians being the face of pro-choice is really bad optics. AOC is nearly 33 years old, unmarried and childless; she does not comprehend what she is fighting for. If you are pro-choice, that's fine, but you ought to seek leaders with children to fight for it and be the face of it. [twitter]https://twitter.com/DrewHLive/status/1540359953914937349[/twitter][/quote] Why is this an issue. Is this a another “motherhood is magical” thing? Because she can certainly comprehend that she wants to make her own choices for her life without being married with a child. What a stupid post. [/quote] The fact that 59% of abortion patients already have at least one child means there are plenty of pro-choice mothers to pick from. And that’s not including the mothers like me who haven’t had abortions but became even more pro-choice once we experienced the full difficulties of pregnancy, childbirth, and parenting. My (unplanned) child is the light of my life, but I wouldn’t wish this on anyone who wasn’t willing going in. [/quote] I was always pro-choice but became staunchly so when pregnant with my first. It was hard AF. And by the time I got accidentally pregnant with a third that was most definitely not wanted, I was busy researching my abortion options. Fortunately for me, nature intervened and I miscarried. I had to have a D&C to make sure everything was gone. But some of these sickos believe even that is a crime. Its my most fervent wish that all of these people rot in hell.[/quote] +1. First pregnancy with husband ended in a miscarriage. I had to have a D&C which I guess would be illegal now? [/quote] A Dand C is not an abortion dip shit. [/quote] Yes, actually, it is. If a doctor has to assist your miscarriage, congratulations. You have had an abortion. [/quote] I have federal health insurance and they paid for my D & C after a miscarriage; they wouldn't have paid for an abortion to end a live pregnancy. But yeah, the laws in red states are going to call it all "abortion". [/quote] No they will not because they are by definition NOT. [/quote] It’s right here in my medical record. It gave me a jolt the first time I read it. Keep living in denial though.[/quote] Again, a procedure to remove an already dead fetus is NOT an abortion of a living baby. Get the f over yourselves. [/quote] NP. Where in the legislation are you reading the complete phrase "abortion [i]of a living baby?" The word "abortion" in medical language refers to the premature exit of the products of conception (the fetus, fetal membranes, and placenta) from the uterus. The word "abortion" is not a comment on how or why that happened, or whether it was an intentional outcome. There are a lot of modifying words used with the medical term "abortion," including but not limited to the following: - spontaneous abortion - induced abortion - complete abortion - incomplete abortion - missed abortion - therapeutic abortion Guess what? If the law doesn't specify, it applies to all of them.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics