Reply to Who did you think killed JonBenet?

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Who did you think killed JonBenet?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't understand why anyone is arguing that open window must mean intruder. If you weee in the home and staging a murder of course you would want to make it look like someone broke in.

Also, I'm seriously wondering if there are tons of rabid Ramsey defenders or just one or two people who can't fathom it. I don't know who did it but the "they loved her!" argument is so weak. Parents kill ALL THE TIME[/quote]

Rabid? Seriously? Are you getting a little [i]too[/i] invested? 
[/quote]

I've made like three comments on this entire thread. Unlike the people who respond to every post with "it isn't the Ramsey's!" and provide no evidence. [/quote]

I think people have provided many ideas that point away from the Ramseys. No one has any evidence but there is so much information available especially when suspicious people made suspicious statements themselves. I think people realize how much damage both the police and the press did to the case. All those images of that little girl in her pageant outfits turned people against Patsy. Those pageants were only a small portion of her life. Her kids probably had a more normal life than the kids of today who are dragged from activity to activity or play sports 365 days a year.[/quote]

None of this is evidence.  The evidence that there was no intruder is overwhelming.[/quote]

Really?? How so? Seems like quite the opposite. 
[/quote]

Parents don't talk to police for 5 months after initial interview.
No signs of intruder
Neighbors report lights on in house that night and people moving around
Patsy ,John, amd Burke all heard on 911 call recording, but parent later claim he was asleep.  
Ramsey's also limited detectives access to Burke
Ramson note in Patsey's handwriting, written on pad left in house, asking for ransom equivalent to John Ramsey's non-public bonus.
As noted in ink above, no other case in history of ransom note and dead kid in house.
Ransom note was two and a half pages, typically aren't more than a page.
She was found wrapped in her favorite blanket Ina room that was basically hidden.
John Ramsey found her though others sea chef house. Plus more than I am too lazy to list.

Honestly, for me ithe tell tale sign was the parents refusal to cooperate with the investigation form very early on, no innocent parent would do that.
[/quote]

Did you watch the Lou Smit documentary?  I was persuaded to quite the opposite conclusion(s) from yours based on Smit's video.[/quote]

Nobody other than Lou Smit and Mary Lacy has ever, EVER seriously doubted that the Ramseys did it. They literally got away with murder because there was some unsubstantiated murky idea that someone else could possibly maybe have done it. That DNA does not convince me at ALL - I do not think we are that advanced in our ability to analyze DNA yet, and given that it was on the pants and the underwear I suspect it was someone involved in the autopsy.  For me, the following make it impossible that it was a stranger:

1. The note. That note was written by a woman and is long and bizarre. No killer hung out in the dark writing that note for more than a half hour.
2. Pasty wearing the same clothes and in full makeup when the police came when they had to leave to catch a flight some 20 minutes after she came downstairs. Who would not have woken the kids up. It has never been reported but I wish there was information about how packed they were. That would be telling. 
3. The pineapple in the bowl with only Pasty and Burke's prints on it that was found in JB's stomach partially digested.
4. The underwear that were multiple sizes too big, apparently bought as a present for Patsy's niece but given to JB - none of the rest of the pack was in JB;s drawer and the remainder of the pack was not found until a year later, intact. Someone found that pack of underwear and used one pair. So, where were her other underwear? washed? No way did she have on size 12 underwear all night long under pants. 
5. Her hair had been redone. 
6. Her body had been washed down after the assault, But her father and mother's clothing fibers from the night before were all over including in the crotch of the underwear which is a big deal if they are not, in fact, the same underwear she had on the night before.
7. She was wearing an entirely different outfit than she had been wearing when put to bed.
8. The blanket that was in the dryer, taken out, and draped over her.
9. The garrote was made using a brush in the house. Presumably a killer would have come with his own.
10. The Rasmey's bizarre claim that they did not know the flashlight that was obviously from their home.
11. The sending of Burke away right away. That is just off and odd. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics