Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "What's going on with FCBEscola NOVA?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=RantingSoccerDad][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=RantingSoccerDad][quote=Anonymous]See this is exactly the thing right here, people attacked a club they have never seen. Then, when people at the club defended their experience at the club they were then told there was no way they possibly could be happy based on the cost and the tourney results. The Barca folks again tried to frame their position in other ways why they were happy. Then critics simply called them zealots and propagandist. And here you are, a reporter saying nothing more than, “no, I just don’t like you.” Which is the gist of what all the critics have simply been saying. And that is still just a deflection and has nothing to do with the original basic question of the club. So now that you have admitted what your issue is, it is time for others to simply do the same and just move on from the thread because you or many of the other “critics” are not legitimately interested in the actual club. [/quote] I'm not sure I can make this any clearer ... 1. [b]I am not criticizing Barca[/b]. I'm in no position to do so. I think they may have placed some of their teams in leagues for which they weren't prepared, but that happens. It's not a big deal. 2. I AM criticizing people who react to even the slightest question as if we're all spitting on Cruyff's grave. [/quote] Sure you're not. [quote=RantingSoccerDad] "Haven't checked in for a while -- is the basic gist of the last several pages that Barca has lured tons of players away from VDA and other programs because the training is better? And yet those players go to Barca and don't get great results? So Barca lured all these great players away for better training -- and they don't win much, even after a year or two with Barca? I know -- you can't judge solely by results. But [b]if you're claiming to attract players who've won elsewhere, and now they're losing, it's awfully difficult to call that progress.[/b]" [/quote] Nothing critical in that at all. You literally turned "two" into "tons." How Trumpian of you. [/quote] Nothing in that is critical of the club. It’s critical of you. [/quote] No, I never made any of those claims. I wasn't involved in the discussion about players moving at all. I only got involved to address your dishonest attack, and then your equally dishonest attempt at walking it back when others called you on it. Thin skinned much? LOL[/quote] He was perfectly in bounds with what he wrote. Others who read this thread feel exactly the same about the few thread wardens who regularly post here, including you. Your tone and content gives you away every time. [/quote] I have no issue with valid criticisms of what Barca is lacking. I've posted a few myself. RSD's "gist of it post" was factually incorrect. That's not being defensive; that's expecting anyone - most of all a journalist - to post accurate information. If someone doesn't, then that poster should expect to be called out on it. RSD is no exception.[/quote] gist noun 1. the substance or essence of a speech or text. Feel free to disagree with my assessment of the "gist" of those pages. You can say it's hyperbole. To say it's "factually incorrect" is itself factually incorrect. Also, headlines in The Onion aren't real. They're just painfully close.[/quote] I truly don't want to get into a "ping pong" with you - or anyone. It has no value. However, this is the one thread where your posts seem to have a bias. So, let me give it a chance and see if I have misunderstood you. Are you saying your post factually correct, or was it an attempt at an Onion post? The Onion articles I read were factually incorrect and intended to make fun of people's misconceptions? Factually incorrect based on all the misconceptions and incorrect concepts in there: such as "tons of VDA players". If it was an "Onion" post and you were trying to be sarcastic and funny but recognize the fallacies in it, then I'll say ok. I didn't pick up on it, but I'll accept that and leave it be.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics