Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Gee, with a huge lead like this, it would be really pretty embarrassing if Trump and the Republicans don't win the election in November, don't you agree? They've clearly got the upper hand now, so it's a no brainer they'll win. If they lose, it must signal a major failing of the Republican brand and a complete rejection of all the policies Trump is pitching, right? So, given Trump's huge lead, which of you Trump supporters is brave enough to bet on the outcome? If Trump loses, you agree to complete exile from DCUM politics for one year. This should be a no brainer for you, since you're so convinced Trump will win. Who's brave enough to take the bet? [/quote] You really do not understand what Trump represents. This is a once in a generational shift of a party. Trump does not care about social issue, it's an economic message. Remember the trans bath use issue. He did not care about it. It drove th establishment types crazies. They saw it as a wedge issues. The parties are slowly reversing with the Dems representing moneyed elites and the republicans taking on a more working man positions. This will not happen over night but it has already started. The next republican candidate could go farther with out Trump's baggage. The anti Union business crowd will move to Hillary's Democrats and the rank and file union members start voting republican. Let's face it Trump could win over a lot of voters with a "huge" infrastructure program(make America great again), pushing for trade protection for manufacturing and correcting the tax favoring investment over manufacturing. [/quote] blah-blah-blah Are you taking the bet?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics