Anonymous
Post 07/27/2016 11:35     Subject: Re:July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
The good thing about this election is that we have a real choice in terms of philosophies.

Unfortunately the two candidates are the most f-cked up individuals one could find.
Anonymous
Post 07/27/2016 11:04     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:but, but, but -- she's a woman, glass ceiling, little girls . . .


By all means, shatter the glass. But please let it be shattered by women who are honest, ethical and independent of "male support."


this is why women will never be president in your lifetime.

you think Trump voters think he's honest and ethical and free of dad support?
Anonymous
Post 07/27/2016 10:56     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Sounds like Team Trump is all hat, no cattle.
Anonymous
Post 07/27/2016 10:52     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Anonymous wrote:A bet with an anonymous stranger on an anonymous forum? Who cares?


NP. Your honesty and ethics are really all that matter. Do you have so much faith in Trump that you'd vow to give up DCUM politics page for one entire year when he loses?
Anonymous
Post 07/27/2016 10:33     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
A bet with an anonymous stranger on an anonymous forum? Who cares?
Anonymous
Post 07/27/2016 10:31     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Gee, with a huge lead like this, it would be really pretty embarrassing if Trump and the Republicans don't win the election in November, don't you agree? They've clearly got the upper hand now, so it's a no brainer they'll win. If they lose, it must signal a major failing of the Republican brand and a complete rejection of all the policies Trump is pitching, right?

So, given Trump's huge lead, which of you Trump supporters is brave enough to bet on the outcome? If Trump loses, you agree to complete exile from DCUM politics for one year.

This should be a no brainer for you, since you're so convinced Trump will win. Who's brave enough to take the bet?


You really do not understand what Trump represents. This is a once in a generational shift of a party. Trump does not care about social issue, it's an economic message. Remember the trans bath use issue. He did not care about it. It drove th establishment types crazies. They saw it as a wedge issues. The parties are slowly reversing with the Dems representing moneyed elites and the republicans taking on a more working man positions. This will not happen over night but it has already started. The next republican candidate could go farther with out Trump's baggage. The anti Union business crowd will move to Hillary's Democrats and the rank and file union members start voting republican. Let's face it Trump could win over a lot of voters with a "huge" infrastructure program(make America great again), pushing for trade protection for manufacturing and correcting the tax favoring investment over manufacturing.


blah-blah-blah

Are you taking the bet?
Anonymous
Post 07/27/2016 10:29     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Anonymous wrote:Gee, with a huge lead like this, it would be really pretty embarrassing if Trump and the Republicans don't win the election in November, don't you agree? They've clearly got the upper hand now, so it's a no brainer they'll win. If they lose, it must signal a major failing of the Republican brand and a complete rejection of all the policies Trump is pitching, right?

So, given Trump's huge lead, which of you Trump supporters is brave enough to bet on the outcome? If Trump loses, you agree to complete exile from DCUM politics for one year.

This should be a no brainer for you, since you're so convinced Trump will win. Who's brave enough to take the bet?


You really do not understand what Trump represents. This is a once in a generational shift of a party. Trump does not care about social issue, it's an economic message. Remember the trans bath use issue. He did not care about it. It drove th establishment types crazies. They saw it as a wedge issues. The parties are slowly reversing with the Dems representing moneyed elites and the republicans taking on a more working man positions. This will not happen over night but it has already started. The next republican candidate could go farther with out Trump's baggage. The anti Union business crowd will move to Hillary's Democrats and the rank and file union members start voting republican. Let's face it Trump could win over a lot of voters with a "huge" infrastructure program(make America great again), pushing for trade protection for manufacturing and correcting the tax favoring investment over manufacturing.
Anonymous
Post 07/27/2016 10:11     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Gee, with a huge lead like this, it would be really pretty embarrassing if Trump and the Republicans don't win the election in November, don't you agree? They've clearly got the upper hand now, so it's a no brainer they'll win. If they lose, it must signal a major failing of the Republican brand and a complete rejection of all the policies Trump is pitching, right?

So, given Trump's huge lead, which of you Trump supporters is brave enough to bet on the outcome? If Trump loses, you agree to complete exile from DCUM politics for one year.

This should be a no brainer for you, since you're so convinced Trump will win. Who's brave enough to take the bet?
Anonymous
Post 07/27/2016 10:10     Subject: Re:July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
By all means, shatter the glass. But please let it be shattered by women who are honest, ethical and independent of "male support."


This!
Anonymous
Post 07/27/2016 10:10     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:but, but, but -- she's a woman, glass ceiling, little girls . . .


By all means, shatter the glass. But please let it be shattered by women who are honest, ethical and independent of "male support."


You mean like all successful men who depend on the support of women???
Anonymous
Post 07/27/2016 10:09     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Anonymous wrote:but, but, but -- she's a woman, glass ceiling, little girls . . .

Yes very annoying.
Anonymous
Post 07/27/2016 10:07     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Anonymous wrote:but, but, but -- she's a woman, glass ceiling, little girls . . .


By all means, shatter the glass. But please let it be shattered by women who are honest, ethical and independent of "male support."
Anonymous
Post 07/27/2016 10:05     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
but, but, but -- she's a woman, glass ceiling, little girls . . .
Anonymous
Post 07/27/2016 09:24     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Ouch.
Anonymous
Post 07/27/2016 09:17     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
http://www.latimes.com/politics/

The latest tracking poll included two days of DNC convention and Hillary's numbers continue to slide.

The USC Dornsife/L.A. Times Presidential Election "Daybreak" Poll asks more than 400 people each day about their voting intentions. The poll is part of the Understanding America Study (UAS) at the University of Southern California's Dornsife Center for Economic and Social Research.

Each day's poll respondents are a subset of the UAS election panel, roughly 3000 U.S. citizens who were randomly recruited from among all households in the United States.