Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
MD Public Schools other than MCPS
Reply to "Elementary schools that are great despite Great Schools rating?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] I'm not sure what you're taking issue with here. HES also has a LEP percentage of 21.9% (students with limited to no ability to understand, speak, read, or write English) and a FARMS rate of 76.8% (children who are eligible for free/reduced price meals). HES has a Great Schools rating of 2, a score which is largely based on overall test scores. What do you attribute the Great Schools rating to? Or, really, what would you prefer others to attribute it to? HES is also much loved by people who have other (good) options and it's a locus of community pride.[/quote] There are other ES in the county with similar stats that have much higher Great Schools ratings so although those issues may contribute to low test scores there must be something else going on at the school. Spellman has a FARMS rate of 82.5% and a LEP percentage of 25.2% and they are rated a 6 on Great Schools. Although socioeconomic issues clearly do contribute to low test scores, they shouldn't be used to explain away everything. I'm not saying that HES isn't a perfectly good school, I'm just saying that we shouldn't necessarily use these metrics to explain away low GS ratings. [/quote] Other schools with larger numbers of limited English percentages and higher FARMS rates, but higher great schools ratings: Hollywood Elementary: GS #6. 35% limited English proficiency, similar FARMS rate Lewisdale: GS #6, 57.5% limited English proficiency, 93.6% FARMS Adelphi ES: GS #7, 42.5% limited English proficiency, 93.% FARMS Rosa Parks ES: GS#4, 57% limited English proficiency, 92.5% FARMS Chillum ES: GS#4, 36.6% limited English proficiency, 89.8% FARMS Langley Park ES: GS #4, 46% limited English proficiency, greater than 95% FARMS There are obviously some schools in the county that are doing really, really good reading and math work with their limited English proficiency and FARMS students and those schools should be congratulated. I know there are great things going on at schools with a low GS score and there may be less than great things going on at schools with high GS scores, but it gets tiring to hear that a really low GS score is due only to socio-economic factors when some schools are often doing very well with the same challenges. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics