Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I'm not sure what you're taking issue with here. HES also has a LEP percentage of 21.9% (students with limited to no ability to understand, speak, read, or write English) and a FARMS rate of 76.8% (children who are eligible for free/reduced price meals). HES has a Great Schools rating of 2, a score which is largely based on overall test scores. What do you attribute the Great Schools rating to? Or, really, what would you prefer others to attribute it to?
HES is also much loved by people who have other (good) options and it's a locus of community pride.
There are other ES in the county with similar stats that have much higher Great Schools ratings so although those issues may contribute to low test scores there must be something else going on at the school. Spellman has a FARMS rate of 82.5% and a LEP percentage of 25.2% and they are rated a 6 on Great Schools.
Although socioeconomic issues clearly do contribute to low test scores, they shouldn't be used to explain away everything.
I'm not saying that HES isn't a perfectly good school, I'm just saying that we shouldn't necessarily use these metrics to explain away low GS ratings.
Other schools with larger numbers of limited English percentages and higher FARMS rates, but higher great schools ratings:
Hollywood Elementary: GS #6. 35% limited English proficiency, similar FARMS rate
Lewisdale: GS #6, 57.5% limited English proficiency, 93.6% FARMS
Adelphi ES: GS #7, 42.5% limited English proficiency, 93.% FARMS
Rosa Parks ES: GS#4, 57% limited English proficiency, 92.5% FARMS
Chillum ES: GS#4, 36.6% limited English proficiency, 89.8% FARMS
Langley Park ES: GS #4, 46% limited English proficiency, greater than 95% FARMS
There are obviously some schools in the county that are doing really, really good reading and math work with their limited English proficiency and FARMS students and those schools should be congratulated.
I know there are great things going on at schools with a low GS score and there may be less than great things going on at schools with high GS scores, but it gets tiring to hear that a really low GS score is due only to socio-economic factors when some schools are often doing very well with the same challenges.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I'm not sure what you're taking issue with here. HES also has a LEP percentage of 21.9% (students with limited to no ability to understand, speak, read, or write English) and a FARMS rate of 76.8% (children who are eligible for free/reduced price meals). HES has a Great Schools rating of 2, a score which is largely based on overall test scores. What do you attribute the Great Schools rating to? Or, really, what would you prefer others to attribute it to?
HES is also much loved by people who have other (good) options and it's a locus of community pride.
There are other ES in the county with similar stats that have much higher Great Schools ratings so although those issues may contribute to low test scores there must be something else going on at the school. Spellman has a FARMS rate of 82.5% and a LEP percentage of 25.2% and they are rated a 6 on Great Schools.
Although socioeconomic issues clearly do contribute to low test scores, they shouldn't be used to explain away everything.
I'm not saying that HES isn't a perfectly good school, I'm just saying that we shouldn't necessarily use these metrics to explain away low GS ratings.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. I really really appreciate the feedback. I'm curious as to how PP at 13:02 would respond to PP at 13:21. The Hyattsville ES you describe is exactly the kind of thing I was hoping to hear, but the scared part of me is worried about the stuff 13:21 is mentioning, particularly if a strong principal were to, say, move on. How are class sizes at Hyattsville ES?
I'm not sure yet whether or not bad MS and HS feeders is an issue for me. Part of me would maybe be ok going private at that point. Obviously that's the case or else I wouldn't even be considering staying in PG.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Check out Hyattsville Elementary School. It has a strong principal (Julia Burton), PTA, and aftercare options (Art Works Now, Joe's Movement, perhaps Pyramid Atlantic soon). There's widespread community support for the school. Large numbers of unusually well-educated parents are taking a hands-on approach to investing in and improving their local school. The test scores reflect the diverse make-up of the student body. Language and socio-economic barriers keep those test scores (and, consequently, the Great Schools rating) from reflecting the school's strengths, but those who live in Hyattsville are justifiably proud of their neighborhood school. Search the archives for HES and you'll see what I mean.
Unfortunately, I'm not quite as enthused about Hyattsville Middle School or Northwestern High School. Everything in this area is trending upward, so I'm hopeful for future improvements, especially as the vanguard of involved PTA parents has started to transition over to the middle school. Still, that's something to keep an eye on for longer-range planning.
Can we stop explaining away low greatschools rating as a consequence of language and socio-economic barriers? The school has some great things going for it esp. a strong and committed PTA, but I find the constant use of the bolded text to be disturbing. I can see using socio-economic barriers to explain the difference between a 6/7 or an 8/9.
Anonymous wrote:Check out Hyattsville Elementary School. It has a strong principal (Julia Burton), PTA, and aftercare options (Art Works Now, Joe's Movement, perhaps Pyramid Atlantic soon). There's widespread community support for the school. Large numbers of unusually well-educated parents are taking a hands-on approach to investing in and improving their local school. The test scores reflect the diverse make-up of the student body. Language and socio-economic barriers keep those test scores (and, consequently, the Great Schools rating) from reflecting the school's strengths, but those who live in Hyattsville are justifiably proud of their neighborhood school. Search the archives for HES and you'll see what I mean.
Unfortunately, I'm not quite as enthused about Hyattsville Middle School or Northwestern High School. Everything in this area is trending upward, so I'm hopeful for future improvements, especially as the vanguard of involved PTA parents has started to transition over to the middle school. Still, that's something to keep an eye on for longer-range planning.
Anonymous wrote:DH and I are debating our options - we currently live in PG Laurel but want to move closer in to the city to reduce our commute. We're also really keen on our daughter attending public school. We're debating 2 options - buy a modestly priced house in Takoma Park and get in on MoCo, or buy close in in PG and try our luck with immersion lottery and/or the local elementary and/or possibly Friends Community, though I've heard it's getting really competitive. We have a few years to make the move, but I'm trying to figure things out now.
I know the Great Schools site can be a load of c*&% but it's somewhere for me to start. I get that the "best" elementaries in PG are either specialty programs, TAG, or in Bowie. We'd want to live as close to the city as possible so Bowie is out. I see that Greenbelt is rated as ok, but it's still kind of far out (I'd love to get inside the beltway). Where should we be looking? University Park? Hyattsville? Mt. Rainier? Which elementaries are maybe rated low on the websites but are actually great schools - on an upward trend, with great administration and a strong focus on academics? I like diversity (as in a healthy mix). I'm not interested in my kid being a trail blazer - I want her to go to an excellent school with excellent teachers, so if I'm just chasing the unicorn here in PG County, I'd rather know the harsh truth now! Thanks everyone in advance for your input.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It won't reduce your commute any, but if you are in the Bond Mill district, I'd seriously consider staying there for a couple of years. From what I can tell, it's one of the best run schools in the county. The principal has a great reputation. The school seems like a nice diverse family.
We're not - we're in old town (Laurel ES). I've heard good things about Bond Mill too. Honestly though--and it's not a knock on Laurel because I know many love it--that kind of place isn't for me. The small towny conservative thing is killing me, and so is the commute.
Anonymous wrote:It won't reduce your commute any, but if you are in the Bond Mill district, I'd seriously consider staying there for a couple of years. From what I can tell, it's one of the best run schools in the county. The principal has a great reputation. The school seems like a nice diverse family.
