Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Kids With Special Needs and Disabilities
Reply to "What makes someone identify processing speed as being low? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][b]Any difference in WISC sub-scores that is greater than 15 points (aka 1 standard deviation) is considered "significant".[/b] So your child has a sub-scores that are 2 standard deviations apart, which is quite significant. This means that the FSIQ is not an accurate representation of intelligence. The person who did the testing should have considered whether to compute a GAI instead. Basically, the significant difference between the subscores means that the IQ is an artificially low representation of intelligence (maybe only by a few points in your case since the processing speed is still above average and the IQ is quite high anyway). If you take these results to a 504 or IEP committee, they may try to tell you that this isn't a problem, because the child is still above the average. Ask direct questions of the psychologist at the table about the significant difference. Basically these differences can be a flag for looking ADHD, LD's, executive dysfunction or impacts in other academic areas -- processing speed significantly lower than IQ can make it difficult for kids to do the physical and organizational work to keep up with their brain. [/quote] Is it 1 standard deviation or 2? I thought it was 2. [/quote] 1 standard deviation is statistically significant. 1.5 standard deviations is the borderline of beginning to get help (meaning "light" help like accommodations) a great standard deviation may be necessary to get an IEP, together with other evidence like adverse impact, etc. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics