Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Teaching "good touch, bad touch" in the wake of the Oyster-Adams sex abuse case"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Honestly, no touch is the best for young kids. Pedophiles gain trust by starting with good touch, and then the kids feel safe and secure with them, and then bad touch starts happening.[/quote] Have you taught preschool? Because it's impossible to teach little kids without touching them. You hold their hands on field trips, and help them wash their hands after they've been finger painting, and high five them when they've done a good job, and put on bandaids, and tie their shoes. Those are the kinds of "good touch" that Good Touch Bad Touch talks about. And yes, if you're a good teacher then one of your goals is that the kids feel safe and secure with you. Little kids can't learn in an environment where they don't feel safe and secure. Teaching your kid to be afraid of teachers, on the chance that they might be pedophiles, is not the solution. The solution is complex and multi dimensional, and includes things like rigorous background checks, 2 deep supervision, and teaching kids to know what to do when they're touched inappropriately.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics