Reply to AAP Expansion and Haycock - Elizabeth Schultz amendment

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "AAP Expansion and Haycock - Elizabeth Schultz amendment"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Do you even read your own email?  It was sent out among the Haycock community today because they have a right to know that Elizabeth Schultz is making his proposal that will affect their community.  You will hear Haycock voices shout down this amendment tonight, as they shouted down Patty Reed's similar proposals last week.  At least Patty Reed was listening, and pulled her amendments.  Schultz just obviously thinks she knows best, regardless of the facts on the ground, or anybody else's opinion.[/quote]

It's clear that Schultz's main goal is to get in Janie Strauss's face, since Strauss voted in favor of closing Clifton ES, Schultz's old school.  While I think FCPS should have kept Clifton open, Schultz ought to be embarassed here.  It's not her district, she's not an at-large member, and she hasn't done anything to show a Pimmit Annex is feasible or desired by more than a handful of current AAP parents.

With stunts like this, Schultz can pretty much forget about getting support for any of her own initiatives.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics