Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "AAP Expansion and Haycock - Elizabeth Schultz amendment"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]A complete non-starter of a solution[/quote] I agree with 14:08. The Haycock principal [i]and[/i] the Lemon Road principal already testified in front of the Board at a work session last week that they opposed the idea of a "Haycock annex." This new amendment asks the Board to create an annex where there isn't even a school -- no administration, no counselors, no librarian. So it's proposing creating an entirely NEW infrastructure (read: more cost) wholly for temporary use. The idea of the Lemon Road annex arguably made more sense, from a cost perspective, but both principals had other reasons for opposing it. I have no idea why Schultz made this amendment (and at the last minute, too), but I would think it would be very unlikely to pass.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
