Reply to GA Aspire / ECNL-RL

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "GA Aspire / ECNL-RL"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]In terms of the rankings from the app

GFR - 324
Valor - 1024
Loudoun Aspire - 1356
VRSC Aspire - 1409
Herndon- 2977

As you can see there is a big range in level between these teams. [/quote]

Ranking apps are BS and you know it. [/quote]

What is your objective measure?[/quote]. You could say that the rankings app does not capture teams that play kick ball, park the bus, in order to achieve wins, but don’t develop.  I get it, but those teams should lose out over the wrong run to teams that develop.  So, really what you are saying is that we should only be looking at is the rankings at the top years, those that have prioritized development over winning at the younger ages…. And I would agree.  What are the consistent better teams at the older ages, those that have promoted development properly?  Then again, there is a lot of movement at the older ages to those clubs that recruit better, which also tends to be the clubs that develop better.  So what is the answer other than sending kids to the teams that recruit better?  Find the clubs that win better at the older age groups, not the younger, and find the ones that recruit better.  That is the answer.  Anything else is nonsense.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics